• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专家组构成对适宜性评级的影响。

Effect of panel composition on appropriateness ratings.

作者信息

Fraser G M, Pilpel D, Kosecoff J, Brook R H

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterolgy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Soroka Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;6(3):251-5. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/6.3.251.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/6.3.251
PMID:7795961
Abstract

Cholecystectomy is performed frequently and for relatively few indications. An all surgical panel agreed on more indications and fewer contra-indications for cholecystectomy than a mixed specialty panel but did not approve indications for patients with higher comorbidity. In mixed panels subspecialists (gastroenterologists) were more conservative than generalists and surgeons. Similar findings have been shown for carotid endarterectomy. Comparing the results of British and Israeli panels showed variations in rating appropriateness that indicate differences in approach between countries. We conclude that the composition of panels will influence the assessment of appropriateness.

摘要

胆囊切除术实施频繁且适应证相对较少。与一个混合专业小组相比,一个全外科专家小组认同更多的胆囊切除术适应证和更少的禁忌证,但不认可合并症较高患者的适应证。在混合小组中,亚专科医生(胃肠病学家)比全科医生和外科医生更保守。颈动脉内膜切除术也有类似的发现。比较英国和以色列小组的结果显示,在评定适宜性方面存在差异,这表明不同国家之间的方法存在差异。我们得出结论,小组的组成会影响对适宜性的评估。

相似文献

1
Effect of panel composition on appropriateness ratings.专家组构成对适宜性评级的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;6(3):251-5. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/6.3.251.
2
Appropriateness of cholecystectomy in the United Kingdom--a consensus panel approach.英国胆囊切除术的适宜性——一种共识小组方法。
Gut. 1991 Sep;32(9):1066-70. doi: 10.1136/gut.32.9.1066.
3
Variations by specialty in physician ratings of the appropriateness and necessity of indications for procedures.不同专业的医生对手术指征的适当性和必要性的评分差异。
Med Care. 1996 Jun;34(6):512-23. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199606000-00002.
4
Effect of specialty and nationality on panel judgments of the appropriateness of coronary revascularization: a pilot study.专业和国籍对冠状动脉血运重建适宜性专家小组判断的影响:一项试点研究。
Med Care. 2001 May;39(5):513-20. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200105000-00011.
5
Improving the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy: results of a prospective city-wide study.
Stroke. 1999 Jan;30(1):12-5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.1.12.
6
The inappropriate use of carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术的不当应用。
CMAJ. 2004 Aug 31;171(5):473-4. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040725.
7
Explaining geographic variations. The enthusiasm hypothesis.解释地域差异。热情假说。
Med Care. 1993 May;31(5 Suppl):YS37-44. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199305001-00006.
8
Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services?不当使用能否解释医疗服务使用中的小区域差异?
JAMA. 1990 Feb 2;263(5):669-72.
9
The appropriateness of performing coronary angiography in two major teaching hospitals in Israel.
Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;6(3):245-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/6.3.245.
10
Influence of projected complication rates on estimated appropriate use rates for carotid endarterectomy. Appropriateness Project Investigators. Academic Medical Center Consortium.预计并发症发生率对颈动脉内膜切除术估计适宜使用率的影响。适宜性项目研究人员。学术医疗中心联盟。
Health Serv Res. 1997 Aug;32(3):325-42.

引用本文的文献

1
How Delphi studies in the health sciences find consensus: a scoping review.健康科学领域的德尔菲研究如何达成共识:一项范围综述
Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 14;14(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02738-3.
2
Management of new onset loss of sense of smell during the COVID-19 pandemic - BRS Consensus Guidelines.新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行期间新发嗅觉丧失的管理 - BRS 共识指南。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan;46(1):16-22. doi: 10.1111/coa.13636. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
3
Scaffolds for Knee Chondral and Osteochondral Defects: Indications for Different Clinical Scenarios. A Consensus Statement.
用于膝关节软骨和骨软骨缺损的支架:不同临床情况的适应证。共识声明。
Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):1036S-1046S. doi: 10.1177/1947603519894729. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
4
The impact of patient preferences and costs on the appropriateness of spinal manipulation and mobilization for chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain.患者偏好和成本对慢性下背痛和慢性颈痛的脊柱推拿和松动治疗适宜性的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 7;20(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2904-6.
5
The development of quality indicators for the prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands.荷兰基层助产护理中预防和管理产后出血的质量指标的制定。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Oct 20;13:194. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-194.
6
Methods of formal consensus in classification/diagnostic criteria and guideline development.分类/诊断标准和指南制定中的正式共识方法。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;41(2):95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2010.12.001. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
7
An audit tool for assessing the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy.一种用于评估颈动脉内膜切除术适宜性的审计工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Jul 6;4(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-17.
8
Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.在初级保健中制定和应用质量指标所使用的研究方法。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):358-64. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.358.
9
Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术明确标准的制定。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):320-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.320.
10
[Unnecessary attendance at a hospital emergency service and linked factors].[医院急诊服务的不必要就诊及相关因素]
Aten Primaria. 2001 Sep 30;28(5):326-32. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)70384-8.