Sanna M, Karmarkar S, Landolfi M
Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza, Italy.
J Laryngol Otol. 1995 May;109(5):374-80. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100130233.
This study reviews 57 papers dealing with the issue of hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery published in otolaryngologic and neurosurgical literature between the years 1977 and 1994. The authors', in this review, have made an attempt to verify whether the claims of hearing preservation are real, whether there is a price to be paid in terms of morbidity and whether there are univocal criteria for reporting results. The review shows that there is a wide disarray in reporting hearing results and the claims of hearing preservation are often unreal and misleading. On retabulating the results of a few series according to the minimal prerequisites for normal hearing (PTA < or = 30 dB and SDS > or = 70 per cent) and according to other various commonly reported criteria, it became evident that rates of hearing preservation differed a lot depending upon criteria. While any measurable hearing could be preserved in many cases, only a few had normal hearing preserved.
本研究回顾了1977年至1994年间发表在耳鼻喉科和神经外科文献中关于前庭神经鞘瘤手术中听力保留问题的57篇论文。在本综述中,作者试图验证听力保留的说法是否真实,是否要以发病率为代价,以及报告结果是否有明确的标准。综述表明,在报告听力结果方面存在广泛的混乱,听力保留的说法往往不真实且具有误导性。根据正常听力的最低要求(纯音平均听阈≤30 dB且言语辨别率≥70%)以及其他各种常见的报告标准重新整理一些系列的结果后,很明显听力保留率因标准不同而有很大差异。虽然在许多情况下可以保留任何可测量的听力,但只有少数人的听力能恢复正常。