Sanna Mario, Khrais Tarek, Russo Alessandra, Piccirillo Enrico, Augurio Angela
Gruppo Otologico Piacenza-Rome, Via Emmanueli 42, 29100 Piacenza, Italy.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004 Feb;113(2):156-63. doi: 10.1177/000348940411300215.
To compare the results of hearing preservation surgeries using different approaches--the enlarged middle cranial fossa approach and the retrosigmoid approach--and different classification systems, stressing the importance of preserving "normal hearing," we performed a retrospective case review in a tertiary care medical center. The charts of 107 patients with vestibular schwannoma who underwent tumor resection were reviewed. Hearing preservation was reported according to 2 different classification systems: the modified Sanna classification and the classification of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. The facial nerve results were graded according to the House-Brackmann scale. The hearing preservation rates differed markedly depending on the classification used. We conclude that hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma is a more difficult proposition than most surgeons appreciate, especially in terms of serviceable hearing.
为比较采用不同手术入路(扩大中颅窝入路和乙状窦后入路)及不同分类系统的听力保留手术结果,强调保留“正常听力”的重要性,我们在一家三级医疗中心进行了一项回顾性病例研究。回顾了107例行肿瘤切除术的前庭神经鞘瘤患者的病历。根据两种不同的分类系统报告听力保留情况:改良桑纳分类法和美国耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科学会的分类法。面神经结果根据House-Brackmann量表分级。听力保留率因所采用的分类方法不同而有显著差异。我们得出结论,听神经瘤的听力保留比大多数外科医生所认识到的要困难得多,尤其是在有效听力方面。