Suppr超能文献

心肌血流量:氧-15水团注、缓慢输注与氧-15二氧化碳缓慢吸入的比较

Myocardial blood flow: comparison of oxygen-15-water bolus injection, slow infusion and oxygen-15-carbon dioxide slow inhalation.

作者信息

Iida H, Takahashi A, Tamura Y, Ono Y, Lammertsma A A

机构信息

Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels, Akita, Japan.

出版信息

J Nucl Med. 1995 Jan;36(1):78-85.

PMID:7799088
Abstract

UNLABELLED

This study investigates the most appropriate protocol for measuring regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) using 15O-water in clinical applications.

METHODS

Regional MBF, perfusable tissue fraction (PTF) and arterial blood volume (Va) were measured using 15O-water and dynamic PET on five healthy volunteers based on previously published models. Calculated values were compared for the following three tracer administration protocols: 15O-water bolus injection, 15O-water slow (2 min) infusion and 15O-carbon dioxide slow (2 min) inhalation. For the two slow administration protocols, the three parameters MBF, PTF and Va were computed by fitting the model equations to the myocardial regional time-activity curve. For the bolus injection of 15O-water, only two parameters, MBF and PTF, were fitted by using a fixed Va value obtained by a carbon dioxide blood volume scan.

RESULTS

All protocols provided consistent MBF values, and the calculated values were homogeneous throughout the whole myocardial segments for all subjects. PTF values were also homogeneous and consistent in the anterior and lateral wall regions, but were significantly greater in the septum (approximately 20%) when the slow 15O-carbon dioxide inhalation protocol was used. MBF and PTF values obtained from the bolus injection protocol showed the smallest intersubject and interregional variations. The simulation study also showed that the magnitude of error was smallest when the bolus injection protocol was employed.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that the 15O-water bolus injection protocol together with the two-parameter fitting procedure provides the most accurate results for MBF and PTF. However, it requires arterial cannulation and a separate carbon monoxide scan. For clinical studies, however, the 15O-water infusion protocol would be a good alternative, providing MBF and PTF results with an acceptable degree of accuracy and without the need for arterial cannulation.

摘要

未标注

本研究调查了在临床应用中使用(^{15}O) - 水测量局部心肌血流量(MBF)的最合适方案。

方法

基于先前发表的模型,使用(^{15}O) - 水和动态PET对五名健康志愿者测量局部MBF、可灌注组织分数(PTF)和动脉血容量(Va)。比较了以下三种示踪剂给药方案的计算值:(^{15}O) - 水团注注射、(^{15}O) - 水缓慢(2分钟)输注和(^{15}O) - 二氧化碳缓慢(2分钟)吸入。对于两种缓慢给药方案,通过将模型方程拟合到心肌局部时间 - 活性曲线来计算MBF、PTF和Va这三个参数。对于(^{15}O) - 水团注注射,仅通过使用通过二氧化碳血容量扫描获得的固定Va值来拟合MBF和PTF这两个参数。

结果

所有方案提供的MBF值一致,并且所有受试者整个心肌节段的计算值均一。PTF值在前壁和侧壁区域也均一且一致,但在使用缓慢(^{15}O) - 二氧化碳吸入方案时,室间隔中的PTF值明显更大(约20%)。从团注注射方案获得的MBF和PTF值在受试者间和区域间的变化最小。模拟研究还表明,采用团注注射方案时误差幅度最小。

结论

数据表明,(^{15}O) - 水团注注射方案以及双参数拟合程序为MBF和PTF提供了最准确的结果。然而,它需要动脉插管和单独的一氧化碳扫描。然而,对于临床研究,(^{15}O) - 水输注方案将是一个很好的替代方案,可提供具有可接受准确度的MBF和PTF结果,且无需动脉插管。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验