Cicinelli E, Romano F, Anastasio P S, Blasi N, Parisi C, Galantino P
Cattedra di Patologia Ostetrica e Ginecologica, University of Bari, Italy.
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jan;85(1):42-7. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00298-r.
To assess the usefulness of transabdominal sonohysterography in the diagnosis and evaluation of submucous myomas.
Fifty-two premenopausal women hospitalized for hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications underwent preoperative conventional transvaginal sonography, transabdominal sonohysterography, and hysteroscopy. The results of the three techniques in terms of diagnosis, size, intracavitary growth, and location of the submucous myomas were compared with those revealed by direct inspection of the surgical specimens.
Conventional transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of submucous myomas had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 98%; the predictive values of abnormal and normal scans were 90 and 98%, respectively. Transabdominal sonohysterography had sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of 100%, as did hysteroscopy. In all cases, the sonographic techniques measured tumor size more accurately than did hysteroscopy. The transabdominal sonohysterography measurements differed from direct evaluation by no more than 2 mm, and the hysteroscopic measurements were significantly different from those of the surgical specimens. The sonohysterographic evaluation of intrauterine growth was significantly more precise than that of the other techniques, differing from direct measurements by no more than 5-10%. Conventional transvaginal sonography failed to localize three of 11 myomas; hysteroscopy and transabdominal sonohysterography provided the exact location in all cases.
Transabdominal sonohysterography is the most accurate technique for detecting submucous myomas and evaluating their size, intracavitary growth, and location.
评估经腹超声子宫造影术在诊断和评估黏膜下肌瘤中的作用。
52例因良性妇科疾病需行子宫切除术而住院的绝经前女性,术前接受了传统经阴道超声检查、经腹超声子宫造影术和宫腔镜检查。将这三种技术在诊断、大小、宫腔内生长情况及黏膜下肌瘤位置方面的结果与手术标本直接检查所显示的结果进行比较。
传统经阴道超声检查诊断黏膜下肌瘤的敏感性为90%,特异性为98%;异常和正常扫描的预测值分别为90%和98%。经腹超声子宫造影术的敏感性、特异性和预测值均为100%,宫腔镜检查也是如此。在所有病例中,超声检查技术测量肿瘤大小比宫腔镜检查更准确。经腹超声子宫造影术的测量结果与直接评估结果相差不超过2毫米,而宫腔镜检查的测量结果与手术标本的测量结果有显著差异。超声子宫造影术对宫腔内生长情况的评估明显比其他技术更精确,与直接测量结果相差不超过5% - 10%。传统经阴道超声检查未能定位11个肌瘤中的3个;宫腔镜检查和经腹超声子宫造影术在所有病例中都能提供确切位置。
经腹超声子宫造影术是检测黏膜下肌瘤并评估其大小、宫腔内生长情况及位置的最准确技术。