Uri J V, Actor P, Phillips L, Guarini J R, Weisbach J A
Chemotherapy. 1976;22(5):313-8. doi: 10.1159/000221938.
The disc sensitivity and minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of cefazolin and cephalothin were compared against a series of Escherichia coli isolates. These data were correlated with the mouse protective doses of the 2 cephalosporins in animals infected with E. coli strains selected according to their various degrees of in vitro sensitivity to the 2 cephalosporins. The overwhelming majority of E. coli strains showed a significantly higher degree of susceptibility and lower MIC values for cefazolin than for cephalothin. There has been found a good correlation between the inhibition zones and especially the MIC values and the ED50 results for both cephalosporins. Using E. coli clinical isolates, cefazolin was found to be superior to cephalothin not only in vitro experiments but also more potent in protecting the experimentally infected mice.
比较了头孢唑林和头孢噻吩对一系列大肠杆菌分离株的药敏性及最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。这些数据与两种头孢菌素在感染了根据其对两种头孢菌素不同程度的体外敏感性选择的大肠杆菌菌株的动物中的小鼠保护剂量相关。绝大多数大肠杆菌菌株对头孢唑林的敏感性显著高于头孢噻吩,且MIC值更低。已发现两种头孢菌素的抑菌圈,尤其是MIC值与ED50结果之间存在良好的相关性。使用大肠杆菌临床分离株,发现头孢唑林不仅在体外实验中优于头孢噻吩,而且在保护实验感染小鼠方面更有效。