Lane S D
Department of Anthropology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-7125.
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Nov;39(9):1303-14. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90362-x.
This article reviews the background to the current debates between advocates of population control and reproductive health as frameworks for national and international health policies. Population control has been a dominant metaphor in international family planning programs since the 1960s. Population control has frequently meant pursuing a single-minded goal of fertility limitation, often without sufficient attention to the rights of family planning clients. This narrow focus has led to some coercive policies, numerous ethical violations, and ineffective family planning programs. In the last decade there has been the beginning of a policy shift, advocated by a growing number of activists and researchers in women's health, from population control to reproductive health. A reproductive health framework would provide a broader programmatic focus that could bring needed attention to such issues as sexually transmitted diseases, infertility, abortion, reproductive cancers and women's empowerment generally.
本文回顾了在将人口控制和生殖健康作为国家及国际卫生政策框架的倡导者之间,当前辩论的背景。自20世纪60年代以来,人口控制一直是国际计划生育项目中的主导隐喻。人口控制常常意味着一心追求降低生育率的目标,往往没有充分关注计划生育服务对象的权利。这种狭隘的关注点导致了一些强制性政策、众多道德违规行为以及无效的计划生育项目。在过去十年中,出现了政策转变的开端,越来越多的女性健康活动家和研究人员倡导从人口控制转向生殖健康。生殖健康框架将提供更广泛的项目重点,从而能够使人们对诸如性传播疾病、不孕症、堕胎、生殖系统癌症以及女性赋权等问题给予必要的关注。