Onsten I, Carlsson A S
Department of Orthopedics, Malmö General Hospital, Lund University, Sweden.
Acta Orthop Scand. 1994 Oct;65(5):517-21. doi: 10.3109/17453679409000904.
60 patients with arthrosis who received a Charnley total hip replacement were randomly assigned to either an uncemented porous Harris-Galante type I socket or a cemented all-polyethylene Charnley socket. Socket migration and rotation were studied by radiostereometry (RSA) for 2 years. After 2 years, all sockets were still in situ. There was no difference in migration or rotation between the 2 socket designs, nor was there any difference in pain or function. We conclude that the initial fixation of the Harris-Galante socket resembles that of the Charnley socket.
60例接受Charnley全髋关节置换术的骨关节炎患者被随机分为两组，分别使用非骨水泥型多孔Harris-Galante I型髋臼杯或骨水泥型全聚乙烯Charnley髋臼杯。通过放射立体测量法（RSA）对髋臼杯的移位和旋转进行了2年的研究。2年后，所有髋臼杯仍在位。两种髋臼杯设计在移位或旋转方面没有差异，疼痛或功能方面也没有差异。我们得出结论，Harris-Galante髋臼杯的初始固定与Charnley髋臼杯相似。
