Onsten I, Carlsson A S, Ohlin A, Nilsson J A
Department of Orthopaedics, Malmö General Hospital, Lund University, Sweden.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Feb;76(2):185-94. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199402000-00004.
Twenty-one patients who had primary osteoarthrosis were managed with a bilateral total hip arthroplasty with insertion of a Charnley femoral component. In each patient, one hip was randomly allocated to have a Harris-Galante acetabular component inserted without cement, and the contralateral hip was treated with an all-polyethylene Charnley acetabular component fixed with cement. The clinical result was satisfactory in all patients. All forty-two hips were followed, with respect to migration of the acetabular component, with use of roentgenstereophotogrammetric analysis for a median of twenty-seven months (range, twenty-three to forty-nine months). Each patient served as his or her own control. Maximum migration in any direction was 1.7 and 2.1 millimeters, and maximum rotation was 2.2 and 2.0 degrees for the Harris-Galante and Charnley acetabular components, respectively. There was no significant difference in migration between the two designs of acetabular components (p = 0.98, p = 0.75, and p = 0.06 for the transverse, longitudinal, and sagittal axes, respectively). However, the Harris-Galante acetabular components rotated significantly more than the Charnley acetabular components around two of the three axes (p = 0.008, p = 0.08, and p = 0.03 for the transverse, longitudinal, and sagittal axes, respectively). The Charnley hip implant has been used clinically for a long time, with successful results. Comparison of new designs of implants with the Charnley prosthesis is therefore important. Roentgenstereophotogrammetric analysis provides a potential for detection of problems with fixation at an early stage rather than after long-term follow-up. No major difference in terms of skeletal fixation was found between the two designs of components after short to medium-term follow-up.
21例原发性骨关节炎患者接受了双侧全髋关节置换术,并植入了Charnley股骨假体。在每位患者中,一侧髋关节随机分配植入无骨水泥的Harris-Galante髋臼假体,对侧髋关节则用骨水泥固定的全聚乙烯Charnley髋臼假体进行治疗。所有患者的临床结果均令人满意。对全部42个髋关节进行了髋臼假体移位情况的随访,采用X线立体摄影测量分析,中位随访时间为27个月(范围为23至49个月)。每位患者均作为自身对照。Harris-Galante和Charnley髋臼假体在任何方向上的最大移位分别为1.7毫米和2.1毫米,最大旋转分别为2.2度和2.0度。两种设计的髋臼假体在移位方面无显著差异(横轴、纵轴和矢状轴的p值分别为0.98、0.75和0.06)。然而,Harris-Galante髋臼假体在三个轴中的两个轴上的旋转明显多于Charnley髋臼假体(横轴、纵轴和矢状轴的p值分别为0.008、0.08和0.03)。Charnley髋关节植入物已在临床上使用很长时间,效果良好。因此,将新型植入物设计与Charnley假体进行比较很重要。X线立体摄影测量分析有可能在早期而非长期随访后检测到固定问题。短期至中期随访后,两种设计的假体在骨骼固定方面未发现重大差异。