Arpa J, Campos Y, Cruz Martínez A, Gutiérrez Molina M, Arenas J, Alonso M, Plaza I, Morales C, Palomo F, Barreiro P
Servicio de Neurología, Hospital La Paz, Madrid.
Neurologia. 1994 Oct;9(8):324-36.
The results of laboratory investigations in concerning 15 patients suspected of mitochondrial disease (MD) are presented. Our purpose is to provide an outline of the investigative modalities that support the clinical suspicion and have been found to be useful in the diagnosis. Five clinical groups were studied including 5 exercise intolerances (2 with inflammatory myopathy), 3 with myopathies (1 with dilated cardiomyopathy), 2 with progressive external oftalmoplegia (1 associated with cerebellar ataxia+epilepsy+hypertrophic cardiomyopathy+pes cavus), 4 with encephalopathies (3 with myoclonic encephalopathies with ataxia and dementia and 1 with epilepsy and tremor), and 1 with metabolic acidosis and cardiomyopathy. We used the following categories of investigative procedures: clinical phenotype analysis including pedigree study, neurophysiological tests, bicycle ergometric evaluation, neuroimaging, microscopic study of skeletal muscle biopsy, post-mortem examination, biochemical assays and molecular genetic studies. EMG showed myopathic changes in 5 cases, features of neuropathy in 2, mixed myopathic and neuropathic pattern in 1 and nonspecific changes in 3. EMG was normal in 3 patients. The most common skeletal muscle abnormalities were variation in fiber size (60%), lipid inclusions (33.3%), oxidative subsarcolemmal aggregates (26.7%) and ragged-red fibers (26.7%). Electron microscopy revealed mitochondrial abnormalities in 8 out of 14 patients' muscle biopsies, and in myocardiac and hepatic tissues of another. Site of biochemical defect was located in 12 patients. Complex I defect in 6, complexes I+IV deficiencies in 3, complex II defect in 1, complex IV deficiency in 1, complexes II+IV deficiencies in 1, and complex III defect in 1. In 2 patients the biochemical defect was not located. Mitochondrial DNA alterations were not found in 7 investigated patients. The clinical spectrum of MD has become increasingly wider. After the clinica suspicion, the diagnosis depends up on the appropriate use of skeletal muscle biopsy, biochemical investigations and molecular genetic techniques. Conventional EMG and automatic measurement of the electromyogram are particularly helpful in confirming the clinical suspicion in patients with predominantly central nervous system disease or in cases in which clinical signs are few.
本文展示了对15例疑似线粒体疾病(MD)患者的实验室检查结果。我们的目的是概述有助于支持临床怀疑且已被证明对诊断有用的检查方法。研究了五个临床组,包括5例运动不耐受(2例合并炎性肌病)、3例肌病(1例合并扩张型心肌病)、2例进行性眼外肌麻痹(1例合并小脑共济失调+癫痫+肥厚型心肌病+高弓足)、4例脑病(3例为伴有共济失调和痴呆的肌阵挛性脑病,1例为癫痫和震颤)以及1例代谢性酸中毒和心肌病。我们采用了以下几类检查程序:临床表型分析,包括家系研究、神经生理学测试、自行车测力计评估、神经影像学、骨骼肌活检的显微镜检查、尸检、生化分析和分子遗传学研究。肌电图显示5例有肌病改变,2例有神经病变特征,1例为混合性肌病和神经病变模式,3例为非特异性改变。3例患者肌电图正常。最常见的骨骼肌异常是纤维大小变异(60%)、脂质包涵体(33.3%)、氧化型肌膜下聚集物(26.7%)和破碎红纤维(26.7%)。电子显微镜检查显示,14例患者肌肉活检中有8例存在线粒体异常,另有1例在心肌和肝组织中发现线粒体异常。确定了12例患者生化缺陷的位置。6例为复合体I缺陷,3例为复合体I+IV缺乏,1例为复合体II缺陷,1例为复合体IV缺乏,1例为复合体II+IV缺乏,1例为复合体III缺陷。2例患者未确定生化缺陷位置。7例受调查患者未发现线粒体DNA改变。MD的临床谱越来越广。临床怀疑后,诊断取决于对骨骼肌活检、生化检查和分子遗传学技术的恰当应用。传统肌电图和肌电图自动测量在主要患有中枢神经系统疾病的患者或临床体征较少的病例中,对证实临床怀疑特别有帮助。