Jennings K, Westfall F
Pacer Group, Dayton, Ohio 45402.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 Sep;20(9):500-9. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30096-7.
Since 1988, manufacturing and service industries have been using the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award to assess their management processes (for example, leadership, information, and analysis) against critical performance criteria. Recognizing that the typical Baldrige assessment is time intensive and dependent on intensive training, The Pacer Group, a consulting firm in Dayton, Ohio, developed a self-assessment tool based on the Baldrige criteria which provides a snapshot assessment of an organization's management practices.
The survey was administered at 25 hospitals within a health care system. Hospitals were able to compare their scores with other hospitals in the system, as well as the scores of a Baldrige award winner. Results were also analyzed on a systemwide basis to identify strengths and weaknesses across the system.
For all 25 hospitals, the following areas were identified as strengths: management of process quality, leadership, and customer focus and satisfaction. Weaknesses included lack of employee involvement in the quality planning process, poor design of quality systems, and lack of cross-departmental cooperation.
One of the surveyed hospitals launched improvement initiatives in knowledge of improvement tools and methods and in a patient satisfaction focus. A team was formed to improve the human resource management system. Also, a new unit was designed using patient-centered care principles. A team re-evaluated every operation that affected patients on the unit.
A survey modeled after the Baldrige Award criteria can be useful in benchmarking an organization's quality improvement practices.
自1988年以来,制造业和服务业一直在使用马尔科姆·鲍德里奇国家质量奖,根据关键绩效标准评估其管理流程(例如,领导力、信息和分析)。认识到典型的鲍德里奇评估耗时且依赖强化培训,俄亥俄州代顿市的一家咨询公司——佩塞集团,开发了一种基于鲍德里奇标准的自我评估工具,该工具可对组织的管理实践进行快速评估。
该调查在一个医疗系统内的25家医院进行。医院能够将自己的得分与系统内的其他医院以及一位鲍德里奇奖获得者的得分进行比较。还在全系统范围内对结果进行了分析,以确定整个系统的优势和劣势。
对于所有25家医院,以下领域被确定为优势:过程质量管理、领导力以及以客户为中心和客户满意度。劣势包括员工在质量规划过程中的参与度不足、质量体系设计不佳以及缺乏跨部门合作。
其中一家接受调查的医院在改进工具和方法的知识以及以患者满意度为重点方面发起了改进举措。成立了一个团队来改进人力资源管理系统。此外,还根据以患者为中心的护理原则设计了一个新科室。一个团队重新评估了该科室影响患者的每一项操作。
以鲍德里奇奖标准为蓝本的调查在对组织的质量改进实践进行标杆管理方面可能会很有用。