Williams D M, Collins B C
Hindman Settlement School, Kentucky.
J Learn Disabil. 1994 Nov;27(9):589-97. doi: 10.1177/002221949402700908.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of the constant time delay procedure, while comparing the efficiency of using teacher-selected and student-selected material prompts, in teaching multiplication facts to 4 male students with learning disabilities ranging in age from 9 years 6 months to 13 years 10 months. The two prompting strategies were compared in the context of a multiple-probe design across groups of multiplication facts, in which the sequence of strategies was counterbalanced across students. Results indicated that although the constant time delay procedure used with material prompts was effective, instruction was more efficient when students were allowed to select the material prompt.
本研究评估了恒定时间延迟程序的有效性,同时比较了使用教师选择和学生选择的材料提示在教授9岁6个月至13岁10个月的4名有学习障碍的男学生乘法口诀时的效率。在跨乘法口诀组的多探针设计背景下比较了这两种提示策略,其中策略顺序在学生之间进行了平衡。结果表明,虽然使用材料提示的恒定时间延迟程序是有效的,但当允许学生选择材料提示时,教学效率更高。