Castelnuovo-Tedesco P
St. Louis Psychoanalytic Institute, Missouri.
Psychoanal Study Child. 1994;49:159-74.
This paper reviews the current status of the relationship between psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy and notes that, since the 1950s, the scope of indications for psychoanalysis has widened so that it has absorbed some of the clinical territory previously assigned to psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Simultaneously, these developments have brought changes in therapeutic technique and more blurring of the boundaries between these two approaches. By examining the manifestations of transference and their management both in psychoanalysis and in psychoanalytic psychotherapy, the author offers the view that these modalities of treatment, though linked in multiple ways, are basically different and that each has its preferential indications.
本文回顾了精神分析与精神分析心理治疗之间关系的现状，并指出，自20世纪50年代以来，精神分析的适应症范围有所扩大，以至于它吸收了一些以前分配给精神分析心理治疗的临床领域。同时，这些发展带来了治疗技术的变化，也使这两种方法之间的界限更加模糊。通过考察精神分析和精神分析心理治疗中移情的表现及其处理方式，作者认为，这两种治疗方式虽然在多种方面存在联系，但本质上是不同的，且每种方式都有其优先适应症。
