• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自恋者与非自恋者的修订版新人格问卷剖析

Revised NEO Personality Inventory profiles of narcissistic and nonnarcissistic people.

作者信息

Ramanaiah N V, Detwiler F R, Byravan A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale 62901-6502.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 1994 Aug;75(1 Pt 2):512-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.75.1.512.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.1994.75.1.512
PMID:7809326
Abstract

This study investigated the construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory against the Revised NEO Personality Inventory to test the hypothesis that narcissistic and nonnarcissistic people have different personality profiles. The two inventories were administered to 96 male and 92 female undergraduates. Multivariate as well as univariate analyses of variance indicated that the Revised NEO Personality Inventory profiles were significantly different for narcissistic and nonnarcissistic groups which supported the construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory.

摘要

本研究针对《自恋型人格量表》的结构效度进行了调查,以《大五人格量表修订版》作为对照,来检验自恋者与非自恋者具有不同人格特征的假设。这两份量表对96名男性和92名女性本科生进行了施测。多变量及单变量方差分析表明,自恋组与非自恋组在《大五人格量表修订版》上的得分显著不同,这支持了《自恋型人格量表》的结构效度。

相似文献

1
Revised NEO Personality Inventory profiles of narcissistic and nonnarcissistic people.自恋者与非自恋者的修订版新人格问卷剖析
Psychol Rep. 1994 Aug;75(1 Pt 2):512-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.75.1.512.
2
The MMPI and the MCMI in the evaluation of narcissism in a clinical sample.在临床样本中使用明尼苏达多相人格测验(MMPI)和米隆临床多轴量表(MCMI)评估自恋
J Pers Assess. 1993 Apr;60(2):239-51. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6002_3.
3
A test of two brief measures of grandiose narcissism: the narcissistic personality inventory-13 and the narcissistic personality inventory-16.两种简短的夸大性自恋测量方法的测试:自恋人格问卷-13和自恋人格问卷-16。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Dec;25(4):1120-36. doi: 10.1037/a0033192. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
4
The five-factor narcissism inventory: a five-factor measure of narcissistic personality traits.五因素自恋人格量表:一种五因素测量自恋人格特质的工具。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(5):500-12. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.670680. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
5
Conceptions of narcissism and the DSM-5 pathological personality traits.自恋观念与 DSM-5 病理性人格特质。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):339-52. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486692. Epub 2013 Apr 21.
6
The Effect of Response Format on the Psychometric Properties of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Consequences for Item Meaning and Factor Structure.反应格式对自恋人格问卷心理测量特性的影响:对项目意义和因素结构的影响
Assessment. 2016 Apr;23(2):203-20. doi: 10.1177/1073191114568113. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
7
Structure of personality disorders from the perspective of the Revised Neo Personality Inventory domain scales and the Psychopathology-5 Scales.从修订版新人格量表领域量表和精神病理学-5量表的角度看人格障碍的结构
Psychol Rep. 1999 Dec;85(3 Pt 2):1119-22. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1999.85.3f.1119.
8
Narcissistic Personality Inventory: structure of the adapted Dutch version.自恋人格量表:适应荷兰版本的结构。
Scand J Psychol. 2010 Apr 1;51(2):132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00737.x. Epub 2009 Jul 11.
9
Narcissism and object relations.自恋与客体关系。
Psychol Rep. 1992 Dec;71(3 Pt 1):799-808. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.3.799.
10
A comparison of Agreeableness scores from the Big Five Inventory and the NEO PI-R: consequences for the study of narcissism and psychopathy.大五人格量表和 NEO 人格量表的宜人性得分比较:对自恋和精神病态研究的影响。
Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):335-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191111411671. Epub 2011 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Deception detection with machine learning: A systematic review and statistical analysis.使用机器学习进行欺骗检测:系统评价和统计分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 9;18(2):e0281323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281323. eCollection 2023.
2
What is the emotional core of the multidimensional Machiavellian personality trait?多维马基雅维利主义人格特质的情感核心是什么?
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 22;4:454. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00454. eCollection 2013.