Suppr超能文献

[非治疗性椎体:手术治疗还是保守治疗?]

[Non-therapeutic cone: surgical or conservative management?].

作者信息

Schilling A, Le Cerf P, Rojas I

机构信息

Servicio de Ginecología, Hospital Dr. Sótero del Río.

出版信息

Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 1994;59(1):3-8; discussion 8-9.

PMID:7809429
Abstract

Histological reports of 94 conization specimens with margins' involvement were reviewed. Macroscopically and histologically features of cones and subsequent hysterectomy specimens are described, (N = 70). Patients parity (4.1 vs 2.9 births), cone's height (16.8 mm vs. 21.4 mm) and endo-or exocervical location of margins involvement were found to be statistically different between groups with and without residual disease at hysterectomy, (p < 0.01, p < 0.05 and p < 0.001). No predictable index was found at multiple variable analyses.

摘要

回顾了94例切缘受累的锥切标本的组织学报告。描述了锥切标本及随后子宫切除标本的宏观和组织学特征(N = 70)。发现在子宫切除时有无残留疾病的两组之间,患者的产次(4.1次分娩与2.9次分娩)、锥切高度(16.8毫米与21.4毫米)以及切缘受累的宫颈内或宫颈外位置存在统计学差异(p < 0.01、p < 0.05和p < 0.001)。在多变量分析中未发现可预测指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验