Teague R H, Thornton J R, Manning A P, Salmon P R, Read A E
Lancet. 1978 Jun 24;1(8078):1350-2. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92417-0.
215 colonsocopic examinations were performed on patients with rectal bleeding whose cause had not been determined by barium enema. The probable or definite source of the bleeding was diagnosed in 41% of cases. 13% had a carcinoma, 14% had one or more colonic polyps, 7% had previously unrecognised inflammatory bowel disease. The remainder had various other colonic conditions. The source of bleeding was twice as likely to be found by colonoscopy in patients presenting with frank rectal blood-loss as in those with occult blood. A carcinoma was found twice as often in those patients with diverticular disease as in those without this condition. A lesion was discovered in the majority of patients who had had two or more negative barium enemas. These results emphasise the importance of rectal bleeding as a symptom of colonic abnormality and the value of colonscopy in its investigation in patients where the results of radiology are negative.
对因钡灌肠未明确病因的直肠出血患者进行了215次结肠镜检查。41%的病例诊断出了可能或明确的出血源。13%患有癌,14%有一个或多个结肠息肉,7%有先前未被识别的炎症性肠病。其余患者有各种其他结肠疾病。与隐匿性便血患者相比,结肠镜检查在出现明显直肠失血的患者中发现出血源的可能性是前者的两倍。憩室病患者中发现癌的几率是无此病症患者的两倍。在多数接受过两次或更多次钡灌肠结果为阴性的患者中发现了病变。这些结果强调了直肠出血作为结肠异常症状的重要性以及结肠镜检查在放射学检查结果为阴性的患者的调查中的价值。