Wassermann E M, Pascual-Leone A, Hallett M
Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Exp Brain Res. 1994;100(1):121-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00227284.
We sought to determine whether motor evoked potentials (MEPs) as well as silent periods could be produced in hand and shoulder muscles by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the ipsilateral cerebral hemisphere and, if so, whether their cortical representations could be mapped with respect to those of contralateral muscles. In six normal subjects, we delivered ten stimuli each to a grid of sites 1 cm apart on the scalp. The EMG was recorded and averaged from the contralateral first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and risorius (facial) muscles at rest and the ipsilateral FDI muscle, which was voluntarily contracted. In four of these subjects and an additional subject, we used the same mapping technique and recorded from the deltoid muscle on the right and left sides and the contralateral FDI during activation of the ipsilateral deltoid. In all subjects, the cortical representation of the contralateral risorius was anterolateral to that of the FDI. The contralateral deltoid could be activated in only three subjects. In them, its representation was slightly medial to that of the FDI. All subjects had at least one scalp site where TMS produced MEPs in the ipsilateral FDI. Two subjects had rich ipsilateral hand representations with multiple ipsilateral MEP sites. Both had ipsilateral MEP sites near the representation of the contralateral FDI, but the largest ipsilateral MEPs occurred with TMS at more lateral sites, which were near the representation of the contralateral risorius. In these subjects, the ipsilateral deltoid was preferentially activated at sites medial and posterior to those activating the contralateral muscle. Ipsilateral TMS also produced silent periods in the FDI in all subjects. These silent periods were much more frequent than the ipsilateral MEPs and tended to occur with TMS near the representation of the contralateral FDI. The excitatory cortical representation of the ipsilateral arm muscles is accessible to TMS in normal subjects and is different from that of the homologous contralateral muscles. The hand may have two ipsilateral representations, one of which produces silent periods and the other MEPs at the same stimulus intensity.
我们试图确定经颅磁刺激(TMS)同侧大脑半球是否能在手和肩部肌肉中产生运动诱发电位(MEP)以及静息期,如果可以,其皮质代表区相对于对侧肌肉的皮质代表区是否能够被映射出来。在6名正常受试者中,我们在头皮上以1厘米的间距对一个网格状位点分别给予10次刺激。在静息状态下,从对侧第一背侧骨间肌(FDI)和笑肌(面部)以及同侧自愿收缩的FDI肌肉记录肌电图并进行平均。在其中4名受试者以及另一名受试者中,我们使用相同的映射技术,在同侧三角肌激活期间,从左右两侧的三角肌以及对侧FDI记录数据。在所有受试者中,对侧笑肌的皮质代表区位于FDI的前外侧。只有3名受试者的对侧三角肌能够被激活。在他们身上,其代表区略位于FDI的内侧。所有受试者至少有一个头皮位点,经颅磁刺激在此位点能在同侧FDI中产生运动诱发电位。两名受试者有丰富的同侧手部代表区,有多个同侧运动诱发电位位点。两人的同侧运动诱发电位位点都靠近对侧FDI的代表区,但最大的同侧运动诱发电位是在更外侧的位点进行经颅磁刺激时产生的,这些位点靠近对侧笑肌的代表区。在这些受试者中,同侧三角肌在激活对侧肌肉的位点的内侧和后方位点优先被激活。同侧经颅磁刺激在所有受试者的FDI中也产生了静息期。这些静息期比同侧运动诱发电位更频繁,并且倾向于在靠近对侧FDI代表区的经颅磁刺激时出现。在正常受试者中,经颅磁刺激可触及同侧手臂肌肉的兴奋性皮质代表区,且与同源对侧肌肉的皮质代表区不同。手部可能有两个同侧代表区,其中一个在相同刺激强度下产生静息期,另一个产生运动诱发电位。