• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Personal freedom and responsibility: the ethical foundations of a market-based health care reform.

作者信息

Moffit R E

机构信息

Heritage Foundation, Washington, D.C. 20002.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):471-81. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.471.

DOI:10.1093/jmp/19.5.471
PMID:7815002
Abstract

The current health care system is not operating with a properly functioning market. Health care costs are hidden and often shifted, consumers and providers are insulated from the economic consequences of their decisions, and costs therefore go up dramatically. Instead of attacking both the structural deficiencies and the consequent inequities of the current employer based insurance system, the Clinton Plan simply expands them, and adds a heavier level of government regulation. The ultimate choice for the public is between a health care system based on consumer choice or a government controlled system. In pursuing a market based health care reform that enhances personal freedom and responsibility, two ethical principles are served. First, American consumers will be made aware of the true costs of health care services, and market forces will thus introduce incentives on the part of providers to control costs. Second, justice will be served; for not only will providers of medial services receive their due, but public policy makers can target relief more effectively to those who need it most.

摘要

相似文献

1
Personal freedom and responsibility: the ethical foundations of a market-based health care reform.
J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):471-81. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.471.
2
Rationing and the Clinton health plan.
J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):445-54. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.445.
3
Ethical foundations of the Clinton administration's proposed health care system.克林顿政府提议的医疗保健系统的伦理基础。
JAMA. 1994 Apr 20;271(15):1189-96.
4
Of rescue and responsibility: learning to live with limits.
J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):455-70. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.455.
5
The articulation of values and principles involved in health care reform.医疗保健改革中所涉及的价值观和原则的阐述。
J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):425-33. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.425.
6
The role of ethics in the Clinton reform proposal.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1994 Spring;19(1):217-20. doi: 10.1215/03616878-19-1-217.
7
Should we create a health care system in the United States?我们应该在美国创建一个医疗保健系统吗?
J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):483-90. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.483.
8
[Economics and ethics in public health?].[公共卫生中的经济学与伦理学?]
Gesundheitswesen. 1999 Jan;61(1):1-7.
9
Health care reform: a study in moral malfeasance.
J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):501-16. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.501.
10
Ethics, politics, and health care reform.
J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):397-405. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.397.

引用本文的文献

1
Health care allocation, public consultation and the concept of 'health'.医疗保健资源分配、公众咨询与“健康”概念
Health Care Anal. 1998 Sep;6(3):193-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02678104.