• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Patient satisfaction and the LoFric catheter for clean intermittent catheterization.

作者信息

Diokno A C, Mitchell B A, Nash A J, Kimbrough J A

机构信息

Department of Urology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.

出版信息

J Urol. 1995 Feb;153(2):349-51. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199502000-00015.

DOI:10.1097/00005392-199502000-00015
PMID:7815580
Abstract

A pilot study was initiated to determine patient satisfaction with the use of a newly available pre-lubricated, hydrophilic, disposable LoFric* catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. The study population consisted of 16 new patients and 25 experienced with clean intermittent catheterization. Patients were asked questions regarding convenience, ease of handling, comfort and general opinion of the catheters. Four new and 8 experienced patients dropped out of the study. Of the new patients who completed the study 75% found clean intermittent catheterization less troublesome than expected and all wish to continue using the catheter. Of the experienced patients 81% had a more favorable general opinion of the disposable than of the previous catheter, 81% found the disposable catheter to be more convenient and 88% thought it was easier to handle. It appears that most people will be satisfied with the disposable catheter and will prefer it as an alternative to a plastic catheter with lubrication applied by the patient.

摘要

相似文献

1
Patient satisfaction and the LoFric catheter for clean intermittent catheterization.
J Urol. 1995 Feb;153(2):349-51. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199502000-00015.
2
Clean intermittent catheterization in boys using the LoFric catheter.
J Urol. 1996 Dec;156(6):2041-3.
3
A novel product for intermittent catheterisation: its impact on compliance with daily life--international multicentre study.一种用于间歇性导尿的新型产品:其对日常生活依从性的影响——国际多中心研究。
Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):213-20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.041. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
4
Patient experience with hydrophilic catheters used in clean intermittent catheterization.
J Pediatr Urol. 2008 Oct;4(5):367-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
5
A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study comparing polyvinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride-free catheter materials.一项比较聚氯乙烯和无聚氯乙烯导管材料的多中心、双盲、随机、平行组研究。
J Urol. 2009 Dec;182(6):2794-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.047. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
6
Clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: long-term followup of a hydrophilic low friction technique.脊髓损伤患者的清洁间歇性导尿:亲水低摩擦技术的长期随访
J Urol. 1995 Feb;153(2):345-8. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199502000-00014.
7
A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization.一项关于LoFric亲水涂层导尿管与传统塑料导尿管用于清洁间歇性导尿的前瞻性随机试验。
J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):994-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000051160.72187.e9.
8
[Is it possible to live with clean intermittent catheterization?].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1993 Dec 13;155(50):4077-9.
9
InstantCath from Hollister: pre-lubricated self-catheterization.霍利斯特公司的即时导尿管:预润滑自行导尿。
Br J Nurs. 2000;9(6):357-60. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2000.9.6.6341.
10
Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterisation reduce urethral micro trauma: a prospective, randomised, participant-blinded, crossover study of three different types of catheters.用于间歇性导尿的亲水涂层导管可减少尿道微创伤:一项对三种不同类型导管进行的前瞻性、随机、参与者盲法交叉研究。
Eur Urol. 2005 Dec;48(6):978-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.07.009. Epub 2005 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long-term bladder conditions.间歇性导尿技术、策略和设计用于管理长期膀胱状况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 26;10(10):CD006008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006008.pub5.
2
Catheters for intermittent catheterization: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.间歇性导尿导管:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Spinal Cord. 2021 Jun;59(6):587-595. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00620-w. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
3
Recent Updates in Urinary Catheter Products for the Neurogenic Bladder Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.
脊髓损伤所致神经源性膀胱患者导尿产品的最新进展
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2019 Oct 28;15(2):77-87. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2019.15.e41. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
WITHDRAWN: Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management.撤回:间歇性导尿用于长期膀胱管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 8;8(8):CD006008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006008.pub4.
5
Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review.神经源性患者不同自我间歇性导尿方法的结果比较:一项系统综述
Spinal Cord. 2017 Jul;55(7):629-643. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.192. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
6
Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis.间歇性使用亲水、凝胶储液器和非涂层导尿管进行自我导尿:系统评价和成本效益分析。
BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e8639. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8639.
7
Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: a prospective, randomized, crossover study.用于间歇性导尿的新型无聚氯乙烯导管材料的评估:一项前瞻性、随机、交叉研究。
Scand J Urol. 2013 Feb;47(1):33-7. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.696136. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
8
Teaching patients clean intermittent self-catheterisation prior to anti-incontinence or prolapse surgery: is it necessary in women with obstructive voiding dysfunction?在进行抗失禁或脱垂手术前向患者教授清洁间歇性自我导尿:对于有阻塞性排尿功能障碍的女性是否有必要?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):739-43. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-0072-1. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
9
Complicated catheter-associated urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis.由大肠杆菌和奇异变形杆菌引起的复杂性导尿管相关尿路感染
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008 Jan;21(1):26-59. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00019-07.
10
Design of a simulated urethra model for the quantitative assessment of urinary catheter lubricity.用于定量评估导尿管润滑性的模拟尿道模型设计
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001 Jan;12(1):15-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1026744732504.