• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区分威士忌(uisge beatha)和白兰地(干邑)的能力。

Ability to distinguish whisky (uisge beatha) from brandy (cognac).

作者信息

Campbell E J, Campbell D M, Roberts R S

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ. 1994;309(6970):1686-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6970.1686.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.309.6970.1686
PMID:7819986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2542667/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess ability to distinguish between first rate malt whisky and brandy and between different brands of each.

DESIGN

Crossover with two sessions of 12 blindfold tastings of two whiskies and two brandies before and after supper, repeated not more than seven days later.

SETTING

Dundas, Ontario.

PARTICIPANTS

4 volunteers aged 50-68 years, all moderate drinkers of alcohol and members of a wine club.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of samples correctly identified (whisky v brandy) and, of those, the proportion of brands correctly identified.

RESULTS

Only one participant produced irrefutable statistical evidence (P < 0.0001) of being able to distinguish between whisky and brandy, correctly identifying 50/51 (98%) samples. Two participants achieved some success in identification (72%, P = 0.0031 and 65% P = 0.031). The fourth participant's responses reflected pure guesswork. Brandy was no easier to identify than whisky (P = 0.84). The participant who was best able to distinguish between whisky and brandy was also best able to identify correctly the brand of whisky (100%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Despite the fact that not all participants completed the full number of tastings the results show that some participants could distinguish neither between malt whisky and brandy nor between different brands of whisky and brandy. However, the success of one participant shows that "it can be done" and that his whisky specific ability is acquired not innate.

摘要

目的

评估区分一流麦芽威士忌和白兰地以及区分二者不同品牌的能力。

设计

采用交叉试验设计,在晚餐前后进行两场共12次的蒙眼品酒,每次品尝两种威士忌和两种白兰地,不超过7天后重复进行。

地点

安大略省邓达斯。

参与者

4名年龄在50 - 68岁之间的志愿者,均为适度饮酒者且是一个葡萄酒俱乐部的成员。

主要观察指标

正确识别样品的比例(威士忌与白兰地),以及在这些识别中正确识别品牌的比例。

结果

只有一名参与者产生了无可辩驳的统计证据(P < 0.0001),表明能够区分威士忌和白兰地,正确识别了50/51(98%)的样品。两名参与者在识别上取得了一定成功(分别为72%,P = 0.0031和65%,P = 0.031)。第四名参与者的回答纯粹是猜测。白兰地并不比威士忌更容易识别(P = 0.84)。最能区分威士忌和白兰地的参与者也最能正确识别威士忌的品牌(100%,P < 0.0001)。

结论

尽管并非所有参与者都完成了全部品酒次数,但结果表明,一些参与者既无法区分麦芽威士忌和白兰地,也无法区分不同品牌的威士忌和白兰地。然而,一名参与者的成功表明“这是可以做到的”,而且他对威士忌的特殊辨别能力是后天习得而非天生的。

相似文献

1
Ability to distinguish whisky (uisge beatha) from brandy (cognac).区分威士忌(uisge beatha)和白兰地(干邑)的能力。
BMJ. 1994;309(6970):1686-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6970.1686.
2
Can malt whisky be discriminated from blended whisky? The proof. A modification of Sir Ronald Fisher's hypothetical tea tasting experiment.麦芽威士忌能与调和威士忌区分开来吗?证据。罗纳德·费希尔爵士假设的品茶实验的一种变体。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983;287(6409):1912-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6409.1912.
3
In the real world, people prefer their last whisky when tasting options in a long sequence.在现实世界中,人们在长时间的品酒序列中品尝选项时,更喜欢他们的最后一杯威士忌。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 20;13(8):e0202732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202732. eCollection 2018.
4
Chronoamperometric estimation of cognac and brandy antioxidant capacity using MWNT modified glassy carbon electrode.使用多壁碳纳米管修饰玻碳电极对干邑白兰地和白兰地的抗氧化能力进行计时电流法评估。
Talanta. 2014 Jul;125:378-84. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.03.039. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
5
Multielemental Analysis of Various Kinds of Whisky.多种威士忌的多元素分析。
Molecules. 2019 Mar 27;24(7):1193. doi: 10.3390/molecules24071193.
6
Maturation of whisky changes ethanol elimination kinetics and neural effects by increasing nonvolatile congeners.威士忌的陈酿通过增加非挥发性同系物来改变乙醇消除动力学和神经效应。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Jan;31(1 Suppl):S77-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00291.x.
7
Alcoholic drinks and asthma: a survey.酒精饮料与哮喘:一项调查
Br J Dis Chest. 1983 Oct;77(4):370-5.
8
Urinary excretion of tetrahydro-beta-carbolines relating to ingestion of alcoholic beverages.
Alcohol Alcohol. 1996 Mar;31(2):197-203. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a008132.
9
[Determination of the percentage of grain whisky in commercial whiskies by isotopic mass spectrometry].[通过同位素质谱法测定商业威士忌中谷物威士忌的百分比]
Ann Nutr Aliment. 1978;32(5):941-6.
10
Influence of moderate drinking on purine and carbohydrate metabolism.适度饮酒对嘌呤和碳水化合物代谢的影响。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002 Aug;26(8 Suppl):20S-25S. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000026829.60802.67.

引用本文的文献

1
Wine psychology: basic & applied.葡萄酒心理学:基础与应用
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 May 13;5(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00225-6.
2
Multisensory Flavour Perception: Blending, Mixing, Fusion, and Pairing Within and Between the Senses.多感官风味感知:感官内部及不同感官之间的混合、调配、融合与搭配
Foods. 2020 Apr 1;9(4):407. doi: 10.3390/foods9040407.

本文引用的文献

1
Can malt whisky be discriminated from blended whisky? The proof. A modification of Sir Ronald Fisher's hypothetical tea tasting experiment.麦芽威士忌能与调和威士忌区分开来吗?证据。罗纳德·费希尔爵士假设的品茶实验的一种变体。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983;287(6409):1912-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6409.1912.