Suppr超能文献

颈内动脉分叉部动脉内膜切除术-吻合术:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。

Division-endarterectomy-anastomosis of the internal carotid artery: a prospective randomized comparative study.

作者信息

Vanmaele R G, Van Schil P E, DeMaeseneer M G, Meese G, Lehert P, Van Look R F

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital and Medical School, Edegem, Belgium.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Oct;2(5):573-81.

PMID:7820516
Abstract

Saphenous vein patch angioplasty is reported to yield superior results for carotid endarterectomy. In order to evaluate an alternative technique, which leaves the saphenous vein intact for other possible graft purposes, 200 carotid endarterectomies were included in a prospective randomized comparative study. Patients were randomized to two statistically equivalent groups: one group underwent classical carotid endarterectomy through a longitudinal incision with saphenous vein patch angioplasty; the other had endarterectomy through an oblique division of the internal carotid followed by in situ anastomosis. Cross-clamping time was approximately 5min shorter with the division-endarterectomy-anastomosis technique. The overall perioperative (< 30 days) mortality rate was 2.5% and cumulative mortality-morbidity rate 8% in the patch group compared with 4% in the other (P > 0.05). There were significantly more cranial nerve injuries in the patch group, most of which were transient (P < 0.01). The mean follow-up was 365 days. The late mortality rate was 5.5%. There were no late permanent or fatal strokes, but 3% of patients sustained mild transient neurological events. Only three significant (> 60%) stenoses developed during follow-up, all within 9 months. Dilatation and disturbed flow were more pronounced in the patch group (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between both techniques on mortality, disabling neurological morbidity and recurrent stenosis. In conclusion, the results of the division-endarterectomy-anastomosis technique are equivalent to those with patch angioplasty, leaving the patient's venous capital intact.

摘要

据报道,大隐静脉补片血管成形术用于颈动脉内膜切除术可取得更好的效果。为了评估一种替代技术,即保留大隐静脉以备其他可能的移植用途,一项前瞻性随机对照研究纳入了200例颈动脉内膜切除术患者。患者被随机分为两组,两组在统计学上具有可比性:一组通过纵向切口行经典颈动脉内膜切除术并采用大隐静脉补片血管成形术;另一组通过斜行切开颈内动脉行内膜切除术,然后进行原位吻合。采用切开-内膜切除术-吻合术技术时,交叉钳夹时间缩短约5分钟。补片组围手术期(<30天)总死亡率为2.5%,累积死亡率和发病率为8%,而另一组为4%(P>0.05)。补片组的脑神经损伤明显更多,大多数为短暂性损伤(P<0.01)。平均随访时间为365天。晚期死亡率为5.5%。没有晚期永久性或致命性中风,但3%的患者出现轻度短暂性神经事件。随访期间仅出现3例严重(>60%)狭窄,均在9个月内。补片组的扩张和血流紊乱更为明显(P<0.05)。两种技术在死亡率、致残性神经并发症和再狭窄方面无统计学显著差异。总之,切开-内膜切除术-吻合术技术的结果与补片血管成形术相当,同时保留了患者的静脉资源。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验