Tierney W M, Fitzgerald J F, Miller M E, James M K, McDonald C J
Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Med Care. 1995 Jan;33(1):1-14. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199501000-00001.
Hospital cost-containment programs should themselves be cost-effective, targeting high-cost physicians (which requires adjusting for case mix) and patients (which requires early identification). In this study, clinical data available within 24 hours of admission from an electronic medical record system were used to develop statistical models to predict hospital costs. In this retrospective analysis of clinical data and diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), study subjects were 2,355 patients admitted for at least 1 day to the medicine service at an urban teaching hospital with sophisticated electronic medical records. Of these 2,355 patients, 1,663 (71%) had one of the 41 most common DRGs. Predictive models were derived on a random subset of two thirds of the patients and were validated on the remaining third. The following patient data were obtained: admission and prior diagnostic test results, diagnoses, vital signs; demographic data; prior inpatient and outpatient visits; tests and treatments ordered within 24 hours of admission (discretionary data); DRGs; and total inpatient costs (estimated from charges). Diagnosis-related groups explained 24% of the variance in total costs in the derivation patient set and 16% in the validation set. When only nondiscretionary data were used, the models retained only clinical laboratory results and prior diagnoses, explaining 20% of the derivation set variance in total costs and 16% in the validation set. Adding DRGs increased the variance explained in the derivation set to 34%, but decreased to 24% in the validation set. Adding discretionary data substantially increased the explained variance in the derivation and validation patient sets. The models' median predicted costs underestimated true costs by 10% to 13%, with the lowest error in the models using all types of variables. Clinical data gathered during routine clinical care can be used to adjust for case mix and identify high-cost patients early in their hospital stays, when they could be targeted by cost-containment interventions.
医院成本控制项目本身应该具有成本效益,针对高成本医生(这需要根据病例组合进行调整)和患者(这需要早期识别)。在本研究中,利用电子病历系统在入院24小时内可获取的临床数据来开发统计模型,以预测医院成本。在这项对临床数据和诊断相关组(DRG)的回顾性分析中,研究对象为一家拥有先进电子病历的城市教学医院内科服务部门收治至少1天的2355名患者。在这2355名患者中,1663名(71%)属于41种最常见的DRG之一。预测模型是基于三分之二患者的随机子集得出的,并在其余三分之一患者中进行验证。获取了以下患者数据:入院及先前诊断检查结果、诊断、生命体征;人口统计学数据;先前的住院和门诊就诊情况;入院24小时内开具的检查和治疗(可自由决定的数据);DRG;以及住院总费用(根据收费估算)。诊断相关组在推导患者组中解释了总成本方差的24%,在验证组中解释了16%。当仅使用非自由决定的数据时,模型仅保留临床实验室结果和先前诊断,在推导组中解释了总成本方差的20%,在验证组中解释了16%。加入DRG后,推导组中解释的方差增加到34%,但在验证组中降至24%。加入自由决定的数据显著增加了推导和验证患者组中解释的方差。模型预测成本的中位数比实际成本低估了10%至13%,使用所有类型变量的模型误差最小。在常规临床护理期间收集的临床数据可用于根据病例组合进行调整,并在患者住院早期识别出高成本患者,此时他们可成为成本控制干预的目标对象。