Mechanic R, Coleman K, Dobson A
The Lewin Group, Fairfax, VA, USA.
JAMA. 1998 Sep 16;280(11):1015-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.11.1015.
As the managed care environment demands lower prices and a greater focus on primary care, the high cost of teaching hospitals may adversely affect their ability to carry out academic missions.
To develop a national estimate of total inpatient hospital costs related to graduate medical education (GME).
Using Medicare cost report data for fiscal year 1993, we developed a series of regression models to analyze the relationship between inpatient hospital costs per case and explanatory variables, such as case mix, wage levels, local market characteristics, and teaching intensity (the ratio of interns and residents to beds).
A total of 4764 nonfederal, general acute care hospitals, including 1014 teaching hospitals.
Actual direct GME hospital costs and estimated indirect GME-related hospital costs based on the statistical relationship between teaching intensity and inpatient costs per case.
In 1993, academic medical center (AMC) costs per case were 82.9% higher than those for urban nonteaching hospitals (actual cost per case, $9901 vs $5412, respectively). Non-AMC teaching hospital costs per case were 22.5% higher than those for nonteaching hospitals (actual cost per differences in case, $6630 vs $5412, respectively). After adjustment for case mix, wage levels, and direct GME costs, AMCs were 44% more expensive and other teaching hospitals were 14% more costly than nonteaching hospitals. The majority of this difference is explained by teaching intensity. Total estimated US direct and indirect GME-related costs were between $18.1 billion and $22.8 billion in 1997. These estimates include some indirect costs, not directly educational in nature, related to clinical research activities and specialized service capacity.
The cost of teaching hospitals relative to their nonteaching counterparts justifies concern about the potential financial impact of competitive markets on academic missions. The 1997 GME-related cost estimates provide a starting point as public funding mechanisms for academic missions are debated. The efficiency of residency programs, their consistency with national health workforce needs, financial benefits provided to teaching hospitals, and ability of AMCs to maintain higher payment rates are also important considerations in determining future levels of public financial support.
随着管理式医疗环境要求降低价格并更加注重初级保健,教学医院的高成本可能会对其履行学术使命的能力产生不利影响。
对与毕业后医学教育(GME)相关的住院医院总费用进行全国性估计。
利用1993财年医疗保险成本报告数据,我们建立了一系列回归模型,以分析每例住院医院费用与解释变量之间的关系,如病例组合、工资水平、当地市场特征和教学强度(实习生和住院医师与床位的比例)。
共有4764家非联邦综合急性病医院,其中包括1014家教学医院。
基于教学强度与每例住院费用之间的统计关系得出的实际直接GME医院费用和估计间接GME相关医院费用。
1993年,学术医疗中心(AMC)每例费用比城市非教学医院高82.9%(每例实际费用分别为9901美元和5412美元)。非AMC教学医院每例费用比非教学医院高22.5%(每例实际费用差异分别为6630美元和5412美元)。在对病例组合、工资水平和直接GME费用进行调整后,AMC比非教学医院贵44%,其他教学医院比非教学医院贵14%。这种差异的大部分可由教学强度来解释。1997年美国估计的直接和间接GME相关总费用在181亿美元至228亿美元之间。这些估计包括一些与临床研究活动和专业服务能力相关的、本质上并非直接教育性质的间接费用。
教学医院相对于非教学医院的成本,使人们有理由担心竞争市场对学术使命的潜在财务影响。1997年GME相关成本估计为学术使命的公共资助机制的辩论提供了一个起点。住院医师培训项目的效率、它们与国家卫生人力需求的一致性、提供给教学医院的财务收益以及AMC维持较高支付率的能力,也是确定未来公共财政支持水平时的重要考虑因素。