• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[New approaches to evaluation of nonspecific inhalation provocation (dose-response relationship) in the comparative evaluation of bronchial hyperreactivity within the scope of clinical trials].

作者信息

Schlegel J, Meng G, Kieser M, Lorenz J, Kienast K, Ferlinz R

机构信息

III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik-Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Universitätsklinik Mainz.

出版信息

Pneumologie. 1994 Nov;48(11):799-802.

PMID:7824501
Abstract

For the performance of clinical drug trials in the therapy for bronchial hyperresponsiveness, unspecific inhalatory provocation tests are generally employed to judge therapeutic success. In particular, the parameter-specific provocation doses are considered to be the main target values. However, it must be considered that these provocation doses are not equally calculable for every patient in the same way and at any examination time. This leads to the fact that the number of evaluable case studies is often appreciably lower than the number of test participants and that a meaningful therapy group comparison may even not be possible under certain circumstances. An evaluation model is presented here in order to fully exploit the obtained data; in this the percentile changes of the function parameters (estimated by linear regression) at a defined dose of the provocation substance are analyzed. In analogy, a survival time model and, as a supplement, a best case/worst case analysis are performed for further statistical evaluation. With the present procedure, an evaluation with inclusion of all test participants is possible. In contrast to the previously used evaluation procedures, this allows a reliable statistical confirmation of the results of clinical tests in the therapy for bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

摘要

相似文献

1
[New approaches to evaluation of nonspecific inhalation provocation (dose-response relationship) in the comparative evaluation of bronchial hyperreactivity within the scope of clinical trials].
Pneumologie. 1994 Nov;48(11):799-802.
2
[Equivalence of methacholine and carbachol in a nonspecific provocation test (dose-response relationship)].
Pneumologie. 1995 Oct;49(10):535-8.
3
[Comparison of sensitivity and specifity of two bronchial provocation tests with methacholine and hypertonic saline in bronchial hyperreactivity evaluation in asthmatics].[两种支气管激发试验(使用乙酰甲胆碱和高渗盐水)在哮喘患者支气管高反应性评估中的敏感性和特异性比较]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 Feb;22(128):126-9.
4
[Carbachol inhalation provocation test using a reservoir method. 4-step test for the assessment of bronchial hyperreactivity].
Pneumologie. 1991 Aug;45 Suppl 2:679-83.
5
[Non-allergenic bronchial hyperreactivity. Measurement methods and reproducibility].
Rev Mal Respir. 1994;11(2):171-8.
6
[Experimental determination of equivalent percentage changes in measurement parameters of dose-response relations with the inhaled methacholine provocation test].
Pneumologie. 1995 Jun;49(6):383-7.
7
[Randomized double-blind study (third place blinded) to examine the effectiveness and side effects of methacholine in the nonspecific bronchial provocation test].[用于检验乙酰甲胆碱在非特异性支气管激发试验中的有效性和副作用的随机双盲研究(三盲法)]
Pneumologie. 2000 Mar;54(3):99-103. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9080.
8
Provocative challenges to help diagnose and monitor asthma: exercise, methacholine, adenosine, and mannitol.用于辅助诊断和监测哮喘的激发试验:运动、乙酰甲胆碱、腺苷和甘露醇。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2008 Jan;14(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e3282f197f6.
9
[Analysis of bronchial hypersensitivity in patients with bronchial asthma].[支气管哮喘患者支气管高反应性分析]
Ter Arkh. 2000;72(8):17-9.
10
[The inhalation 1 concentration test for the assessment of bronchial reactivity].[用于评估支气管反应性的吸入1浓度试验]
Pneumologie. 1991 Aug;45 Suppl 2:690-4.