Suppr超能文献

同意的一个基本问题。

A fundamental problem of consent.

作者信息

Mitchell J

机构信息

Clyde and Co, London.

出版信息

BMJ. 1995 Jan 7;310(6971):43-6; discussion 46-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6971.43.

Abstract

A consultant anaesthetist gave a diclofenac suppository for postoperative pain to a patient having four teeth extracted under general anaesthesia in the dental surgery. He did not seek the patient's specific consent preoperatively for use of the suppository but told her afterwards what he had done. Charged before the professional conduct committee of the General Medical Council with failure to obtain informed consent and assault, the anaesthetist was found guilty of serious professional misconduct and admonished. This decision has far reaching implications and has caused great concern.

摘要

一名麻醉顾问医生在牙科手术室为一名在全身麻醉下拔除四颗牙齿的患者使用双氯芬酸栓剂以缓解术后疼痛。他术前未征得患者对使用该栓剂的明确同意,但事后告知了她自己所做的事情。该麻醉医生被指控向英国医学总会专业行为委员会隐瞒未能获得知情同意及侵犯行为,被判严重职业不当行为罪名成立并受到训诫。这一决定影响深远,引发了极大关注。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44c6/2548445/c4a06c10b1f0/bmj00574-0048-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验