de Smet A A, Visser K, Kitslaar P J
Department of Surgery, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Vasc Surg. 1994 Nov;8(6):711-5. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80651-6.
Standard assessment of aortoiliac obstructive disease (AIOD) includes arteriography preferably supplemented with femoral artery pressure (FAP) measurements. This study investigated the value of Duplex scanning in classifying AIOD and compared the outcome of Duplex scanning with clinical decision making. One-hundred-and-fifty-three aortoiliac segments of 87 patients were prospectively examined by Duplex scanning, arteriography, and FAP measurements to establish the presence or absence of significant AIOD. The results of these tests were compared to each other and to the subsequent vascular interventions and their success rates. Excellent agreement (kappa 0.82) was found between Duplex scanning and arteriography. The agreement between Duplex scanning and FAP measurements was much lower (kappa 0.52). The correlation between the performed treatment and the assessment of AIOD by Duplex scanning or arteriography was good, whereas the FAP results correlated only moderately with the performed treatment. Endovascular or operative treatment was actually performed in only 63% of the aortoiliac segments with an abnormal FAP test (success rate 80%). Aortoiliac segments with significant AIOD according to arteriography or Duplex scanning were treated invasively in 86% (success rate 81%) and 82% (success rate 80%), respectively. In conclusion, Duplex scanning can replace arteriography as a screening tool for the identification of treatable aortoiliac lesions whereas the value of FAP measurements in the decision making process is limited.
腹主动脉髂动脉闭塞性疾病(AIOD)的标准评估包括动脉造影,最好辅以股动脉压力(FAP)测量。本研究调查了双功超声扫描在AIOD分类中的价值,并将双功超声扫描的结果与临床决策结果进行了比较。对87例患者的153个腹主动脉髂动脉节段进行了前瞻性双功超声扫描、动脉造影和FAP测量,以确定是否存在显著的AIOD。将这些检查的结果相互比较,并与随后的血管介入治疗及其成功率进行比较。双功超声扫描与动脉造影之间具有高度一致性(kappa值为0.82)。双功超声扫描与FAP测量之间的一致性则低得多(kappa值为0.52)。所实施的治疗与双功超声扫描或动脉造影对AIOD的评估之间相关性良好,而FAP结果与所实施的治疗仅呈中度相关。FAP试验异常的腹主动脉髂动脉节段中,实际仅63%进行了血管内或手术治疗(成功率80%)。根据动脉造影或双功超声扫描显示存在显著AIOD的腹主动脉髂动脉节段,分别有86%(成功率81%)和82%(成功率80%)接受了侵入性治疗。总之,双功超声扫描可替代动脉造影作为识别可治疗的腹主动脉髂动脉病变的筛查工具,而FAP测量在决策过程中的价值有限。