Suppr超能文献

非侵入性腹主动脉髂动脉评估。

Non-invasive aortoiliac assessment.

作者信息

Currie I C, Jones A J, Wakeley C J, Tennant W G, Wilson Y G, Baird R N, Lamont P M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, U.K.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995 Jan;9(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(05)80220-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the accuracy of Duplex ultrasound in the assessment of aortoiliac disease.

DESIGN

Prospective, semi-blind study.

SETTING

Vascular laboratory and radiology departments, University Hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-two patients underwent assessment of the aortoiliac segment by femoral pulse palpation, Duplex ultrasound and biplanar arteriography. Of these 184 aortoiliac segments, 68 were also assessed by intraarterial pressure measurements and 80 by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).

MAIN RESULTS

Femoral pulses were abnormal in all 32 occluded aortoiliac segments. Of 152 patent segments, femoral pulse palpation was misleading in 50 (33%). MRA detected all occlusions and had a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 68% for stenoses, compared to arteriography. Colour flow Duplex misdiagnosed four occlusions as stenoses. Duplex had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 93% for stenoses when compared to arteriography. Two stenoses, detected by Duplex and confirmed by pressure gradients, were missed by arteriography.

CONCLUSIONS

Pressure measurements remain the gold standard for aortoiliac examination, arteriography providing only morphological information. The limitations of femoral pulse palpation should be appreciated. Although MRA was faster, Duplex examination proved slightly more sensitive to stenoses. At present, colour Duplex provides the best non-invasive assessment of aortoiliac disease and could prevent unnecessary arteriograms.

摘要

目的

评估双功超声在主髂动脉疾病评估中的准确性。

设计

前瞻性、半盲研究。

地点

大学医院血管实验室和放射科。

材料与方法

92例患者通过股动脉搏动触诊、双功超声和双平面动脉造影对主髂动脉段进行评估。在这184个主髂动脉段中,68个还通过动脉内压力测量进行评估,80个通过磁共振血管造影(MRA)进行评估。

主要结果

在所有32个主髂动脉闭塞段中股动脉搏动均异常。在152个通畅段中,股动脉搏动触诊有50个(33%)产生误导。与动脉造影相比,MRA检测到所有闭塞,对狭窄的敏感性为71%,特异性为68%。彩色血流双功超声将4个闭塞误诊为狭窄。与动脉造影相比,双功超声对狭窄的敏感性为91%,特异性为93%。双功超声检测到并经压力梯度证实的2个狭窄,动脉造影未检测到。

结论

压力测量仍然是主髂动脉检查的金标准,动脉造影仅提供形态学信息。应认识到股动脉搏动触诊的局限性。虽然MRA速度更快,但双功超声检查对狭窄的敏感性略高。目前,彩色双功超声提供了对主髂动脉疾病最佳的非侵入性评估,可避免不必要的动脉造影。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验