Howard M R, Thomas L, Reid M M
Department of Haematology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne.
J Clin Pathol. 1994 Nov;47(11):1006-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.11.1006.
To determine whether the use of different sources of anti-CD13 and anti-CD33 monoclonal antibodies leads to discrepant results in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), which might contribute to the wide variation in the reported incidence of myeloid antigen expressing ALL in childhood.
Stored leukaemic cells from 10 children with previously defined myeloid positive ALL were examined. A range of commercially available anti-CD13 and anti-CD33 monoclonal antibodies, directly conjugated with phycoerythrin or fluorescein isothyocyanate, or both, was used. Positively reacting cells were detected by flow cytometry.
There was a noticeable discordance between the different commercial sources of antibody and between the two fluorochromes in their ability to detect myeloid antigens, as well as variation in the intensity of staining. For CD13, one antibody reacted with eight cases and another with only four. Similarly, CD33 was detected in all 10 cases by one antibody and in only three by another.
The lack of any consistent pattern of results suggests that various commercial antibodies against the same CD antigen might recognise different epitopes and that the number of molecules per cell might vary from case to case. These observations partly explain the variation in reported incidence and the failure to establish the clinical importance of myeloid positivity, and they highlight the importance of standardisation in multicentre studies in which immunophenotypic data are collected.
确定使用不同来源的抗CD13和抗CD33单克隆抗体是否会导致儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)出现不一致的结果,这可能是儿童髓系抗原表达ALL报告发病率差异较大的原因。
对10名先前确诊为髓系阳性ALL的儿童储存的白血病细胞进行检测。使用了一系列与藻红蛋白或异硫氰酸荧光素直接偶联或两者均偶联的市售抗CD13和抗CD33单克隆抗体。通过流式细胞术检测阳性反应细胞。
不同商业来源的抗体以及两种荧光染料在检测髓系抗原的能力上存在明显差异,染色强度也有所不同。对于CD13,一种抗体与8例反应,另一种仅与4例反应。同样,一种抗体在所有10例中检测到CD33,另一种仅在3例中检测到。
缺乏任何一致的结果模式表明,针对同一CD抗原的各种商业抗体可能识别不同的表位,并且每个细胞的分子数量可能因病例而异。这些观察结果部分解释了报告发病率的差异以及未能确定髓系阳性的临床重要性,它们强调了在收集免疫表型数据的多中心研究中标准化的重要性。