Nowakowski J, Nadelman R B, Forseter G, McKenna D, Wormser G P
Department of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla 10595.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995 Feb;32(2 Pt 1):223-7. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(95)90130-2.
Doxycycline is widely used to treat Lyme disease associated with erythema migrans. Whether it is comparable to tetracycline is unknown.
We conducted a two-part retrospective analysis of (1) the safety and efficacy of doxycycline compared with tetracycline and (2) the safety and efficacy of a 14-day versus a 20-day course of doxycycline.
Twenty-seven patients given tetracycline (500 mg four times a day for 14 days [group 1]) were compared retrospectively with 21 patients who received doxycycline (100 mg two or three times a day for 14 days [group 2]). The results for group 2 were also compared with that of 38 patients who received doxycycline for 20 days (100 mg three times daily) in a prospective treatment trial (group 3).
There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug effects or in efficacy at 1 month, but at 1 year there was a trend toward a better outcome in the group treated with tetracycline (p = 0.08). A 14-day course of doxycycline was comparable to a 20-day course in the incidence of adverse drug effects and in clinical outcome.
The principal advantage of doxycycline over tetracycline for the treatment of Lyme disease associated with erythema migrans is the convenience of less frequent dosing, not enhanced efficacy or safety. There appears to be no advantage in extending treatment with doxycycline from 14 to 20 days.
多西环素广泛用于治疗与游走性红斑相关的莱姆病。它是否与四环素相当尚不清楚。
我们进行了一项分为两部分的回顾性分析,一是比较多西环素与四环素的安全性和有效性,二是比较多西环素14天疗程与20天疗程的安全性和有效性。
回顾性比较27例接受四环素治疗的患者(每天4次,每次500mg,共14天[第1组])与21例接受多西环素治疗的患者(每天2或3次,每次100mg,共14天[第2组])。第2组的结果还与38例在前瞻性治疗试验中接受20天多西环素治疗的患者(每天3次,每次100mg)的结果进行了比较(第3组)。
药物不良反应发生率或1个月时的疗效无显著差异,但在1年时,四环素治疗组有预后更好的趋势(p = 0.08)。多西环素14天疗程在药物不良反应发生率和临床结局方面与20天疗程相当。
在治疗与游走性红斑相关的莱姆病方面,多西环素相对于四环素的主要优势在于给药频率较低带来的便利性,而非疗效或安全性的提高。将多西环素的治疗时间从14天延长至20天似乎没有优势。