Nishimura R A, Hayes D L, Holmes D R, Tajik A J
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Feb;25(2):281-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00419-q.
This study was undertaken to determine the mechanism by which improvement in hemodynamic variables may occur with dual-chamber pacing in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.
Dual-chamber pacing has recently been proposed as a therapeutic alternative for the relief of symptoms in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
Fifteen patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction were studied acutely during atrioventricular (AV) sequential pacing at various AV intervals (60, 100, 120, 140, 180 and 240 ms) with use of combined Doppler velocity curves and pressures obtained by high fidelity manometer-tipped catheters and thermodilution cardiac output.
Neither cardiac output nor mean left atrial pressure was significantly different when hemodynamic variables in the baseline state were compared with those during AV sequential pacing at the various AV intervals in all patients. The patients were classified into two groups. In group I (eight patients with PR intervals > 200 ms on the rest 12-lead electrocardiogram), cardiac output was significantly increased when AV sequential pacing at the optimal AV interval to output was compared with that at the baseline state (3.0 +/- 1.0 vs. 3.9 +/- 0.43 liters/min, p = 0.005) because timing of mechanical atrial and ventricular synchrony was optimized. In addition, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and duration of diastolic filling were increased, and diastolic mitral regurgitation was abolished. In group II (seven patients who had normal AV conduction at rest), cardiac output during AV pacing decreased from the baseline value without change in the diastolic filling period.
Dual-chamber pacing may improve acute hemodynamic variables in selected patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, mainly by optimization of the timing of mechanical atrial and ventricular synchrony. Reestablishment of the optimal diastolic filling period and abolition of diastolic mitral regurgitation may also contribute to hemodynamic improvement.
本研究旨在确定严重左心室功能不全患者采用双腔起搏时血流动力学变量改善的机制。
最近有人提出双腔起搏可作为缓解扩张型心肌病患者症状的一种治疗选择。
对15例严重左心室收缩功能不全患者在不同房室间期(60、100、120、140、180和240毫秒)进行房室顺序起搏时进行急性研究,采用联合多普勒速度曲线以及通过高保真压力传感器尖端导管和热稀释法心输出量获得的压力数据。
在所有患者中,将基线状态下的血流动力学变量与不同房室间期的房室顺序起搏时的变量进行比较时,心输出量和平均左心房压力均无显著差异。患者被分为两组。在第一组(12导联静息心电图PR间期>200毫秒的8例患者)中, 与基线状态相比,当以最佳房室间期进行房室顺序起搏时,心输出量显著增加(3.0±1.0对3.9±0.43升/分钟,p = 0.005),因为机械性心房和心室同步的时机得到了优化。此外,左心室舒张末期压力和舒张期充盈时间增加,舒张期二尖瓣反流消失。在第二组(7例静息时房室传导正常的患者)中,房室起搏期间的心输出量从基线值下降,舒张期充盈时间无变化。
双腔起搏可能改善部分扩张型心肌病患者的急性血流动力学变量,主要是通过优化机械性心房和心室同步的时机。恢复最佳舒张期充盈时间和消除舒张期二尖瓣反流也可能有助于血流动力学的改善。