Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Europace. 2022 May 3;24(5):784-795. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab248.
Investigate haemodynamic effects, and their mechanisms, of restoring atrioventricular (AV)-coupling using pacemaker therapy in normal and failing hearts in a combined computational-experimental-clinical study.
Computer simulations were performed in the CircAdapt model of the normal and failing human heart and circulation. Experiments were performed in a porcine model of AV dromotropathy. In a proof-of-principle clinical study, left ventricular (LV) pressure and volume were measured in 22 heart failure (HF) patients (LV ejection fraction <35%) with prolonged PR interval (>230 ms) and narrow or non-left bundle branch block QRS complex. Computer simulations and animal studies in normal hearts showed that restoring of AV-coupling with unchanged ventricular activation sequence significantly increased LV filling, mean arterial pressure, and cardiac output by 10-15%. In computer simulations of failing hearts and in HF patients, reducing PR interval by biventricular (BiV) pacing (patients: from 300 ± 61 to 137 ± 30 ms) resulted in significant increases in LV stroke volume and stroke work (patients: 34 ± 40% and 26 ± 31%, respectively). However, worsening of ventricular dyssynchrony by using right ventricular (RV) pacing abrogated the benefit of restoring AV-coupling. In model simulations, animals and patients, the increase of LV filling and associated improvement of LV pump function coincided with both larger mitral inflow (E- and A-wave area) and reduction of diastolic mitral regurgitation.
Restoration of AV-coupling by BiV pacing in normal and failing hearts with prolonged AV conduction leads to considerable haemodynamic improvement. These results indicate that BiV or physiological pacing, but not RV pacing, may improve cardiac function in patients with HF and prolonged PR interval.
通过在正常和衰竭心脏的综合计算-实验-临床研究中,使用起搏器治疗恢复房室(AV)耦联,研究血流动力学效应及其机制。
在 CircAdapt 正常和衰竭人心和循环模型中进行计算机模拟。在房室传导阻滞的猪模型中进行实验。在一项初步临床研究中,在 22 例心力衰竭(HF)患者(左心室射血分数<35%)中测量左心室(LV)压力和容积,这些患者 PR 间期延长(>230ms)且 QRS 波群狭窄或非左束支传导阻滞。正常心脏的计算机模拟和动物研究表明,保持 AV 耦联而不改变心室激活顺序可使 LV 充盈、平均动脉压和心输出量增加 10-15%。在衰竭心脏的计算机模拟和 HF 患者中,双心室(BiV)起搏(患者:从 300±61 减少至 137±30ms)缩短 PR 间期可显著增加 LV 每搏量和每搏功(患者:分别为 34±40%和 26±31%)。然而,使用右心室(RV)起搏恶化心室不同步会消除恢复 AV 耦联的益处。在模型模拟、动物和患者中,LV 充盈的增加和相关的 LV 泵功能改善与二尖瓣流入(E 和 A 波面积)增加和舒张期二尖瓣反流减少同时发生。
在正常和衰竭心脏中,通过 BiV 起搏恢复 AV 耦联可导致相当大的血流动力学改善。这些结果表明,BiV 或生理性起搏,而不是 RV 起搏,可能改善 HF 和延长 PR 间期患者的心脏功能。