• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维多利亚时代疫苗提供者对百日咳疫苗的态度。

Attitudes of Victorian vaccine providers to pertussis vaccine.

作者信息

MacIntyre C R, Nolan T

机构信息

National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Canberra, ACT.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 1994 Sep 5;161(5):295-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1994.tb127448.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1994.tb127448.x
PMID:7830663
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the attitudes of Victorian vaccine providers to the pertussis component of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine (DTP), and to examine differences between kinds of health professionals. Also, to assess vaccine providers' understanding of National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines on childhood immunisation with DTP.

METHODS

We conducted a postal survey of 765 randomly selected Victorian health professionals involved in childhood vaccination, including medical officers of health (MOHs), general practitioners (GPs), maternal child health nurses (MCHNs), paediatricians and environmental health officers (EHOs).

RESULTS

Most (83%) knew that the pertussis component was most frequently responsible for adverse effects of DTP. Thirty-four per cent of all respondents (9% MCHNs, 23% paediatricians, 24% MOHs, 34% EHOs and 39% GPs) believed that pertussis vaccine causes permanent brain damage, 34% did not, and 32% were unsure; 39% believed it causes encephalopathy. Only 9% described vaccination practices entirely in accordance with NHMRC guidelines. Up to 58% of respondents would give diphtheria-tetanus vaccine (DT) in situations when DTP was indicated, and up to 54% would give DTP when it is clearly contraindicated. There was no correlation between knowledge of the safety of DTP and vaccination practices.

CONCLUSION

Victorian vaccine providers have doubts about the safety of pertussis vaccine. There is a need to ensure the availability and clarity of immunisation guidelines for health workers, to educate them about the use of pertussis vaccine, and to ensure that this knowledge is put into practice.

摘要

目的

评估维多利亚州疫苗接种人员对白喉-破伤风-百日咳疫苗(DTP)中百日咳成分的态度,并研究不同类型卫生专业人员之间的差异。此外,评估疫苗接种人员对国家卫生与医学研究委员会(NHMRC)关于儿童接种DTP的指南的理解。

方法

我们对765名随机抽取的参与儿童疫苗接种的维多利亚州卫生专业人员进行了邮寄调查,这些人员包括卫生官员(MOHs)、全科医生(GPs)、母婴健康护士(MCHNs)、儿科医生和环境卫生官员(EHOs)。

结果

大多数人(83%)知道百日咳成分是DTP不良反应最常见的原因。所有受访者中有34%(MCHNs为9%,儿科医生为23%,卫生官员为24%,环境卫生官员为34%,全科医生为39%)认为百日咳疫苗会导致永久性脑损伤,34%的人不这么认为,32%的人不确定;39%的人认为它会导致脑病。只有9%的人完全按照NHMRC指南描述疫苗接种操作。高达58%的受访者会在需要接种DTP时接种白喉-破伤风疫苗(DT),高达54%的人会在明确禁忌时接种DTP。DTP安全性知识与疫苗接种操作之间没有相关性。

结论

维多利亚州的疫苗接种人员对百日咳疫苗的安全性存在疑虑。需要确保为卫生工作者提供免疫指南并使其清晰易懂,对他们进行百日咳疫苗使用方面的教育,并确保这些知识得到应用。

相似文献

1
Attitudes of Victorian vaccine providers to pertussis vaccine.维多利亚时代疫苗提供者对百日咳疫苗的态度。
Med J Aust. 1994 Sep 5;161(5):295-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1994.tb127448.x.
2
Randomised controlled trial of two-component, three-component, and five-component acellular pertussis vaccines compared with whole-cell pertussis vaccine. Ad Hoc Group for the Study of Pertussis Vaccines.与全细胞百日咳疫苗相比,双组分、三组分和五组分无细胞百日咳疫苗的随机对照试验。百日咳疫苗研究特设小组。
Lancet. 1997 Nov 29;350(9091):1569-77. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)06508-2.
3
A controlled trial of two acellular vaccines and one whole-cell vaccine against pertussis. Progetto Pertosse Working Group.两种无细胞百日咳疫苗和一种全细胞百日咳疫苗的对照试验。百日咳项目工作组。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 8;334(6):341-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602083340601.
4
Combined DTP-HBV-HIB vaccine versus separately administered DTP-HBV and HIB vaccines for primary prevention of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae B (HIB).白喉、破伤风、百日咳、乙型肝炎和B型流感嗜血杆菌(HIB)联合疫苗与分别接种白喉、破伤风、百日咳、乙型肝炎疫苗和HIB疫苗用于白喉、破伤风、百日咳、乙型肝炎和B型流感嗜血杆菌(HIB)的一级预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD005530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005530.pub2.
5
Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis: recommendations for vaccine use and other preventive measures. Recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory committee (ACIP).白喉、破伤风和百日咳:疫苗使用及其他预防措施建议。免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)的建议
MMWR Recomm Rep. 1991 Aug 8;40(RR-10):1-28.
6
Half-dose immunization for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis: response of preterm infants.白喉、破伤风、百日咳半剂量免疫:早产儿的反应
Pediatrics. 1989 Apr;83(4):471-6.
7
Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and consistency of production of a Brazilian combined vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type b.一种巴西白喉、破伤风、百日咳和b型流感嗜血杆菌联合疫苗的免疫原性、反应原性及生产一致性
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2008 Nov;103(7):711-8. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762008000700014.
8
Pertussis vaccine effectiveness among children 6 to 59 months of age in the United States, 1998-2001.1998 - 2001年美国6至59个月大儿童的百日咳疫苗效力
Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):e285-94. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2759.
9
Pertussis vaccination: use of acellular pertussis vaccines among infants and young children. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).百日咳疫苗接种:婴幼儿使用无细胞百日咳疫苗。免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)的建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 1997 Mar 28;46(RR-7):1-25.
10
Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of acellular (BIKEN) and whole-cell pertussis vaccines in 15- to 20-month-old children.15至20月龄儿童无细胞(比肯)百日咳疫苗与全细胞百日咳疫苗的安全性和免疫原性比较。
Am J Dis Child. 1993 Mar;147(3):290-4. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160270052017.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of adolescent pertussis immunization, 2004-2009: lessons from Australia.青少年百日咳免疫接种的影响,2004-2009:来自澳大利亚的经验教训。
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Sep 1;89(9):666-74. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.086538. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
2
Which strategy for pertussis vaccination today?如今百日咳疫苗接种采用哪种策略?
Paediatr Drugs. 2002;4(5):299-313. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200204050-00003.