Meischke H, Ho M T, Eisenberg M S, Schaeffer S M, Larsen M P
Department of Health Services, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Feb;25(2):193-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70323-3.
To determine the reasons patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) delay seeking medical care or do not call 911.
Telephone interview of patients hospitalized with suspected AMI.
Nine hospitals in King County, Washington.
Patients admitted to a CCU or ICU between October 1, 1986, and December 31, 1987, with suspected AMI occurring out-of-hospital. Spouses of patients who met criteria but died during the hospitalization also participated.
Hospital records were reviewed, and a 20-minute telephone interview was conducted of patients who reside in King County but do not live in an extended care facility.
Patient demographics, cardiac history, symptoms, time of acute symptom onset, time of emergency department arrival, method of transportation, discharge diagnosis, and hospital outcome were abstracted from hospital records. Circumstances leading to the hospitalization, reasons for delay in seeking care, and reasons for not calling 911 were determined in the telephone interview.
In a 15-month period, 5,207 patients were hospitalized for suspected AMI in King County, Washington. Twenty-seven percent had AMI. Median patient delay between symptom onset and hospital arrival was 2 hours. Paramedics transported 45% of all patients. A representative subset of patients (2,316) were interviewed. The main reasons for delay were because the patient thought that the symptoms would go away, because the symptoms were not severe enough, and because the patient thought that the symptoms were caused by another illness. The main reasons for not calling 911 were because the symptoms were not severe enough, because the patient did not think of calling 911, and because the patient thought that self-transport would be faster because of his or her close location to the hospital.
Maximal benefit from thrombolytic therapy is not realized in a substantial proportion of patients with AMI because of delays in seeking medical care. Knowledge of the reasons patients delay or do not call 911 can help focus efforts on achieving more rapid treatment of patients with AMI.
确定疑似急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者延迟就医或未拨打911的原因。
对因疑似AMI住院的患者进行电话访谈。
华盛顿州金县的九家医院。
1986年10月1日至1987年12月31日期间因院外发生疑似AMI而入住冠心病监护病房(CCU)或重症监护病房(ICU)的患者。符合标准但在住院期间死亡的患者的配偶也参与其中。
查阅医院记录,并对居住在金县但不住在长期护理机构的患者进行20分钟的电话访谈。
从医院记录中提取患者的人口统计学信息、心脏病史、症状、急性症状发作时间、急诊科到达时间、交通方式、出院诊断和医院结局。在电话访谈中确定导致住院的情况、延迟就医的原因以及未拨打911的原因。
在15个月的时间里,华盛顿州金县有5207例患者因疑似AMI住院。其中27%患有AMI。症状发作至入院的患者延迟中位数为2小时。护理人员运送了所有患者的45%。对一组具有代表性的患者(2316例)进行了访谈。延迟的主要原因是患者认为症状会自行消失、症状不够严重以及患者认为症状是由其他疾病引起的。未拨打911的主要原因是症状不够严重、患者没有想到拨打911以及患者认为由于自己离医院较近自行前往会更快。
由于就医延迟,相当一部分AMI患者未能从溶栓治疗中获得最大益处。了解患者延迟或未拨打911的原因有助于集中精力实现对AMI患者更快速的治疗。