Suppr超能文献

在评估鼻腔过敏原激发试验的反应时,声学鼻测量法与前鼻测压法的比较。

Acoustic rhinometry compared with anterior rhinomanometry in the assessment of the response to nasal allergen challenge.

作者信息

Scadding G K, Darby Y C, Austin C E

机构信息

Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1994 Oct;19(5):451-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1994.tb01267.x.

Abstract

Acoustic rhinometry was used to assess nasal airway patency objectively and was compared with the more established method of anterior rhinomanometry. Ten patients with allergic rhinitis underwent 15 nasal challenges with allergen to which they showed positive skin-prick tests. Responses were assessed by measuring the minimum nasal cross-sectional area (Amin.) using acoustic rhinometry and by measuring nasal airway resistance (NAR) using anterior rhinomanometry. The measurements of Amin. and NAR showed a significant negative correlation. Acoustic rhinometry appears to be superior to anterior rhinomanometry in quantifying the response to nasal allergen challenge and may be particularly useful in patients with initial nasal blockage.

摘要

鼻声反射测量法用于客观评估鼻气道通畅性,并与更成熟的前鼻测压法进行比较。10例变应性鼻炎患者接受了15次对其皮肤点刺试验呈阳性的变应原鼻激发试验。通过使用鼻声反射测量法测量最小鼻腔横截面积(Amin.)以及使用前鼻测压法测量鼻气道阻力(NAR)来评估反应。Amin.和NAR的测量结果显示出显著的负相关。在量化对鼻变应原激发试验的反应方面,鼻声反射测量法似乎优于前鼻测压法,并且在初始有鼻塞的患者中可能特别有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验