Scadding G K, Darby Y C, Austin C E
Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1994 Oct;19(5):451-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1994.tb01267.x.
Acoustic rhinometry was used to assess nasal airway patency objectively and was compared with the more established method of anterior rhinomanometry. Ten patients with allergic rhinitis underwent 15 nasal challenges with allergen to which they showed positive skin-prick tests. Responses were assessed by measuring the minimum nasal cross-sectional area (Amin.) using acoustic rhinometry and by measuring nasal airway resistance (NAR) using anterior rhinomanometry. The measurements of Amin. and NAR showed a significant negative correlation. Acoustic rhinometry appears to be superior to anterior rhinomanometry in quantifying the response to nasal allergen challenge and may be particularly useful in patients with initial nasal blockage.
鼻声反射测量法用于客观评估鼻气道通畅性,并与更成熟的前鼻测压法进行比较。10例变应性鼻炎患者接受了15次对其皮肤点刺试验呈阳性的变应原鼻激发试验。通过使用鼻声反射测量法测量最小鼻腔横截面积(Amin.)以及使用前鼻测压法测量鼻气道阻力(NAR)来评估反应。Amin.和NAR的测量结果显示出显著的负相关。在量化对鼻变应原激发试验的反应方面,鼻声反射测量法似乎优于前鼻测压法,并且在初始有鼻塞的患者中可能特别有用。