Stroud J L, Buschang P H, Goaz P W
Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1994 Aug;23(3):169-71. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.23.3.7835519.
This study evaluates sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal diameter, enamel thickness and dentin thickness of the permanent posterior mandibular dentition in order to gain a better understanding of variation in mesiodistal tooth size. The results relate to a sample of 59 males and 39 females, 20-35 years of age. Bitewing radiographs of the right permanent mandibular premolars and molars were illuminated and transferred at a fixed magnification to a computer via a video camera. Enamel and dentin landmarks were identified and digitized on the plane representing the maximum mesiodistal diameter of each tooth. The results showed significant sex differences (p < 0.01) in mesiodistal diameter favouring males over females. Dimorphism was more pronounced for the molars than for the premolars. Enamel thickness, which is 0.4-0.7 mm greater for the molars than premolars, shows no significant sex differences. Dentin is significantly thicker in males than females, and is 3.5-4.0 mm thicker in molars than premolars. It is concluded that sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal tooth sizes is due to differences in dentin thickness and not enamel thickness.
本研究评估下颌后牙列近远中径、牙釉质厚度和牙本质厚度的性别差异,以便更好地了解近远中牙尺寸的变化。研究结果涉及59名男性和39名年龄在20至35岁之间的女性样本。对右侧下颌恒前磨牙和磨牙的咬合翼片进行照明,并通过摄像机以固定放大倍数传输至计算机。在代表每颗牙齿最大近远中径的平面上识别牙釉质和牙本质标志点并进行数字化处理。结果显示,近远中径存在显著的性别差异(p < 0.01),男性大于女性。磨牙的性别差异比前磨牙更明显。磨牙的牙釉质厚度比前磨牙厚0.4 - 0.7毫米,未显示出显著的性别差异。男性的牙本质明显比女性厚,磨牙的牙本质比前磨牙厚3.5 - 4.0毫米。得出的结论是,近远中牙尺寸的性别差异是由于牙本质厚度的差异,而非牙釉质厚度的差异。