Milandri M, Saviotti M
Gruppo di Verifica e Revisione della Qualità, Ospedale Maggiore, USL27, Bulogna.
G Ital Cardiol. 1994 Oct;24(10):1175-86.
This paper proposes a cost benefit approach in evaluating reuse of single-use catheters, introducing cost of disposal and the concept of financial risk. An estimation of relevant variable and fixed costs is discussed, according to conditions and prices presently existing in Northern Italy. A formal model is developed to compare alternative reuse and no-reuse strategies. Use of internal versus external (Service centers) sterilization is also briefly scrutinized. A short review of literature concerning reuse is aimed to place the issue in the proper framework, listing critical problems as far as safety, risks of rupture, identification and control procedures, legal responsibility, informed consent by the patient. The conclusion is proposed that reuse of Medium-to-High cost catheters is highly profitable from the economic standpoint, subject to the condition that stringent quality procedures and controls are implemented to assess reasonable safety on behalf of the patient. Further, size of potential savings and gain in number of procedures performed are likely to request at least some institutional attention. Last, pooling relevant risks among several institutions is a plausible way to lower costs and make reuse possible also to smaller centers. The model may be used for self-assessment purposes concerning reuse introduction; the actual estimate of risk is critical in evaluating results.
本文提出了一种成本效益方法来评估一次性导管的再利用,引入了处置成本和财务风险的概念。根据意大利北部目前的条件和价格,讨论了相关可变成本和固定成本的估计。开发了一个正式模型来比较替代的再利用和不重复使用策略。还简要审查了内部与外部(服务中心)灭菌的使用情况。对有关再利用的文献进行了简短回顾,旨在将该问题置于适当的框架内,列出在安全、破裂风险、识别和控制程序、法律责任、患者知情同意等方面的关键问题。得出的结论是,从中高成本导管的再利用在经济角度来看是非常有利可图的,但前提是要实施严格的质量程序和控制,以代表患者评估合理的安全性。此外,潜在节省的规模和执行程序数量的增加可能至少需要一些机构的关注。最后,在多个机构之间分担相关风险是降低成本并使较小中心也能够进行再利用的一种可行方法。该模型可用于有关引入再利用的自我评估目的;风险的实际估计对于评估结果至关重要。