• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症基因连锁分析中的体细胞等位基因缺失

Somatic allele loss in genetic linkage analysis of cancer.

作者信息

Rebbeck T R, Lustbader E D, Buetow K H

机构信息

Division of Population Science, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Genet Epidemiol. 1994;11(5):419-29. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370110504.

DOI:10.1002/gepi.1370110504
PMID:7835688
Abstract

The ability to detect or reject genetic linkage in studies of human cancer is often diminished because multiple affected relatives in a pedigree are unavailable for analysis. The observation of somatic allele loss in tumors can provide knowledge about gametic phase. Therefore, consideration of tumor genotype data could be used to obtain knowledge about gametic phase ordinarily gained from a larger sample of individuals in cancer families. The objective of the present study is to describe a method for improving the power to detect or reject genetic linkage by using knowledge about somatic genetic changes in tumor tissue. A modification to the lod score method of linkage analysis is proposed in which knowledge of gametic phase in the linkage likelihood is inferred from observations of loss of constitutional heterozygosity (LoH) in tumor tissue. This methodology was evaluated using a double backcross nuclear family with a pair of offspring. The expected lod score improved substantially when tumor genotype data were included in the analysis. For example, when the haplotype remaining in tumor tissue was identical to the inherited haplotype in constitutional tissue 99% of the time, linkage analyses without tumor genotype data would require a 2-5 times larger sample of offspring pairs to conclude linkage with an expected lod score value of 3 or greater, compared to analyses incorporating tumor genotype data. These results suggest that consideration of tumor genotype data using the proposed method can substantially improve the power of linkage analyses in cancer families.

摘要

在人类癌症研究中,检测或排除基因连锁的能力常常会降低,因为家系中多个患病亲属无法用于分析。肿瘤中体细胞等位基因缺失的观察可以提供有关配子期的信息。因此,考虑肿瘤基因型数据可用于获取通常从癌症家族中更大样本个体获得的关于配子期的信息。本研究的目的是描述一种通过利用肿瘤组织中体细胞遗传变化的知识来提高检测或排除基因连锁能力的方法。提出了一种对连锁分析的对数优势分数法的修改方法,其中连锁可能性中的配子期信息是从肿瘤组织中结构杂合性缺失(LoH)的观察中推断出来的。使用一个具有一对后代的双回交核心家系对该方法进行了评估。当分析中纳入肿瘤基因型数据时,预期的对数优势分数显著提高。例如,当肿瘤组织中剩余的单倍型在99%的情况下与结构组织中遗传的单倍型相同时,与纳入肿瘤基因型数据的分析相比,不使用肿瘤基因型数据的连锁分析需要大2至5倍的后代对样本才能得出预期对数优势分数值为3或更高的连锁结论。这些结果表明,使用所提出的方法考虑肿瘤基因型数据可以显著提高癌症家族连锁分析的能力。

相似文献

1
Somatic allele loss in genetic linkage analysis of cancer.癌症基因连锁分析中的体细胞等位基因缺失
Genet Epidemiol. 1994;11(5):419-29. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370110504.
2
Using loss of heterozygosity data in affected pedigree member linkage tests.在受累家系成员连锁分析中使用杂合性缺失数据。
Genet Epidemiol. 1995;12(4):339-50. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370120402.
3
Genetic epidemiology of breast cancer and associated cancers in high-risk families. II. Linkage analysis.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983 Sep;71(3):463-7.
4
The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.基因分型错误对基于家系的数量性状分析的影响。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2001 Feb;9(2):130-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200594.
5
Power to detect linkage with heterogeneity in samples of small nuclear families.在小型核心家庭样本中检测连锁与异质性的效能。
Am J Med Genet. 1993 Jul 15;48(2):94-102. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320480208.
6
Linkage and association.连锁与关联。
Genet Epidemiol. 1998;15(6):565-76. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1998)15:6<565::AID-GEPI2>3.0.CO;2-J.
7
Genome-wide linkage analysis and evidence of gene-by-gene interactions in a sample of 362 multiplex Parkinson disease families.对362个帕金森病家系样本进行全基因组连锁分析及基因间相互作用的证据
Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Oct 15;12(20):2599-608. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg270. Epub 2003 Aug 12.
8
The impact of population admixture on traditional linkage analysis.群体混合对传统连锁分析的影响。
Ethn Dis. 2001 Autumn;11(3):519-31.
9
Combining two-point genetic linkage analyses using mapping functions.使用定位函数结合两点遗传连锁分析。
Genet Epidemiol. 1994;11(1):1-17. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370110102.
10
A variance component approach to dichotomous trait linkage analysis using a threshold model.一种使用阈值模型的二分性状连锁分析的方差分量方法。
Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14(6):987-92. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<987::AID-GEPI71>3.0.CO;2-G.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrated evaluation of DNA sequence variants of unknown clinical significance: application to BRCA1 and BRCA2.对临床意义不明的DNA序列变异进行综合评估:应用于BRCA1和BRCA2基因
Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Oct;75(4):535-44. doi: 10.1086/424388. Epub 2004 Aug 2.
2
Analysis of genetic linkage and somatic loss of heterozygosity in affected pairs of first-degree relatives.对一级亲属患病配对中的遗传连锁和杂合性体细胞缺失进行分析。
Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Aug;61(2):418-22. doi: 10.1086/514849.
3
Mutational analysis of BRCA1 gene in ovarian and breast-ovarian cancer families in Japan.
日本卵巢癌和卵巢-乳腺癌家族中BRCA1基因的突变分析。
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1997 Apr;88(4):407-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1997.tb00397.x.