Lancet. 1995 Feb 4;345(8945):282-5.
In developed countries, use of oral rehydration salts (ORS) solution with osmolarity lower than that of plasma has been recommended because of the risk of hypernatraemia. We compared the clinical efficacy of reduced-osmolarity ORS and standard ORS solutions in children with acute diarrhoea in four developing countries. 447 boys aged 1-24 months, admitted to hospitals in four countries with acute diarrhoea and signs of dehydration, were randomly assigned either standard ORS (311 mmol/L) or reduced-osmolarity ORS (224 mmol/L) solution. Total stool output was 39% greater (95% CI 11-75), total ORS intake 18% greater (3-33), and duration of diarrhoea 22% longer (2-45) in the standard ORS group than in the reduced-osmolarity ORS group. The risk of requiring intravenous infusion after completion of the initial oral rehydration was greater in children given standard ORS solution than in those given reduced-osmolarity ORS solution in three of the four countries (all-country relative risk 1.4 [0.9-2.4]). This relative risk was significantly increased only in non-breastfed children (2.0 [1.0-3.8], p < 0.05). In breastfed children, the relative risk of requiring intravenous infusion was not affected by the ORS solution (0.9 [0.4-2.0]). The mean sodium concentration 24 h after admission was significantly lower in the reduced-osmolarity ORS group than in the standard ORS group (135 [134-136] vs 138 [136-139] mmol/L, p < 0.01). Reduced-osmolarity ORS solution has beneficial effects on the clinical course of acute diarrhoea. Our findings support the use of reduced-osmolarity ORS solution in children with acute non-cholera diarrhoea in developing countries. Further studies are needed to find the best formulation and whether such a solution would be satisfactory for the treatment of cholera.
在发达国家,由于存在高钠血症风险,建议使用渗透压低于血浆的口服补液盐(ORS)溶液。我们比较了低渗ORS溶液和标准ORS溶液对四个发展中国家急性腹泻儿童的临床疗效。447名年龄在1至24个月的男童因急性腹泻和脱水迹象入住四个国家的医院,被随机分配接受标准ORS溶液(311 mmol/L)或低渗ORS溶液(224 mmol/L)。与低渗ORS溶液组相比,标准ORS溶液组的总粪便排出量多39%(95%可信区间11 - 75),ORS总摄入量多18%(3 - 33),腹泻持续时间长22%(2 - 45)。在四个国家中的三个国家,接受标准ORS溶液的儿童在初始口服补液完成后需要静脉输液的风险高于接受低渗ORS溶液的儿童(所有国家的相对风险为1.4 [0.9 - 2.4])。仅在非母乳喂养儿童中,这种相对风险显著增加(2.0 [1.0 - 3.8],p < 0.05)。在母乳喂养儿童中,需要静脉输液的相对风险不受ORS溶液的影响(0.9 [0.4 - 2.0])。入院24小时后,低渗ORS溶液组的平均钠浓度显著低于标准ORS溶液组(135 [134 - 136] vs 138 [136 - 139] mmol/L,p < 0.01)。低渗ORS溶液对急性腹泻的临床病程有有益影响。我们的研究结果支持在发展中国家对急性非霍乱腹泻儿童使用低渗ORS溶液。需要进一步研究以找到最佳配方以及这种溶液对霍乱治疗是否令人满意。