Bahl R, Bhandari N, Bhan M K
Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
Indian J Pediatr. 1996 Jul-Aug;63(4):473-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02905721.
World Health Organization (WHO) recommended standard ORS solution has sodium (90 mmol/L) and glucose (111 mmol/L) almost in the ratio of 1:1 and a total osmolarity of 311 mmol/L. There are concerns that the sodium or glucose concentration and the overall osmolarity in the formulation is not appropriate. Therefore, the efficacy of standard and reduced-osmolarity ORS solutions in young children with acute diarrhea was evaluated in a recent WHO supervised multicentre trial conducted in India (New Delhi), Brazil, Mexico and Peru. The implications of trial results are discussed. In non-cholera diarrhea, both the standard and reduced osmolarity ORS solutions were effective in achieving clinical rehydration. The stool output was 39% higher in the standard ORS solution group as compared to the reduced-osmolarity ORS solution group. The duration of diarrhea was 22% higher in the standard ORS solution group. The risk of requiring supplementary intravenous infusion was increased in children treated with standard ORS solution [relative risk 1.4 (0.9-2.4)]; this benefit was not observed in Indian patients due to high breast feeding rate. The mean sodium concentration at 24 hours after admission was lower in the reduced osmolarity ORS solution group [135 (134-136) vs 138 (136-139), p < 0.01). The low osmolarity ORS deserves to be evaluated in adult cholera to determine its efficacy and any excess hyponatreamia. Meanwhile, it is reassuring that the WHO formulation was effective and its use was not associated with hypenatremia even in young children. Efforts must continue to be made to promote WHO-ORS while research to improve it further is welcome.
世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐的标准口服补液盐(ORS)溶液中钠(90毫摩尔/升)与葡萄糖(111毫摩尔/升)的比例几乎为1:1,总渗透压为311毫摩尔/升。有人担心该配方中的钠或葡萄糖浓度以及总体渗透压不合适。因此,在WHO监督下于印度(新德里)、巴西、墨西哥和秘鲁进行的一项多中心试验中,对标准渗透压和低渗透压ORS溶液在幼儿急性腹泻中的疗效进行了评估。讨论了试验结果的意义。在非霍乱性腹泻中,标准渗透压和低渗透压ORS溶液在实现临床补液方面均有效。与低渗透压ORS溶液组相比,标准ORS溶液组的粪便排出量高39%。标准ORS溶液组的腹泻持续时间长22%。接受标准ORS溶液治疗的儿童需要补充静脉输液的风险增加[相对风险1.4(0.9 - 2.4)];由于母乳喂养率高,在印度患者中未观察到这种情况。低渗透压ORS溶液组入院24小时后的平均钠浓度较低[135(134 - 136)对138(136 - 139),p < 0.01]。低渗透压ORS值得在成人霍乱中进行评估,以确定其疗效以及是否存在任何过量低钠血症。同时,令人放心的是,即使在幼儿中,WHO配方也是有效的,其使用与高钠血症无关。必须继续努力推广WHO-ORS,同时欢迎进一步改进它的研究。