Arlig A, Larsson A, Bergh A C, Jacobsson L, Wikkelsö C
Department of Radiation Physics, University of Göteborg, Sahlgren Hospital, Sweden.
Nucl Med Commun. 1994 Oct;15(10):814-23. doi: 10.1097/00006231-199410000-00007.
A new method for the analysis of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) studies, the 'Min-Max' method, was compared with the conventional method, the 'Average' method. Regional CBF was examined by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using 99Tcm-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (99Tcm-HMPAO). The two methods were used to quantify the rCBF in a population of patients with various dementia disorders, and in healthy controls. Results from a phantom were also used. In the Average method the average counts per pixel (cp-1) within irregular manually drawn regions of interest (ROIs) was registered. In the Min-Max method the minimum cp-1 and maximum cp-1 within rectangular ROIs were registered for white and grey matter, respectively. The relative rCBF (rrCBF) was calculated as the ratio between the regional and cerebellar values. The Min-Max method gave systematically lower values for rrCBF in the white matter, in both clinical studies, and in the phantom, compared to the Average method. No difference was found in the grey matter results. The variability in rrCBF in the phantom study was greater with the Min-Max method than with the Average method, but this effect was counteracted in the clinical studies by a smaller interobserver error. The average regional differences between patients and controls appeared greater with the Min-Max method than with the Average method. The Min-Max method proved to be more simple to execute, involved a smaller observer error, and with respect to ability to distinguish patients with dementia disorders from controls, it appears to function at least as well as the accepted Average method.
一种用于分析局部脑血流量(rCBF)研究的新方法——“最小-最大”法,与传统方法“平均”法进行了比较。使用99锝-六甲基丙烯胺肟(99Tcm-HMPAO)通过单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)检测局部脑血流量。这两种方法用于对患有各种痴呆症的患者群体以及健康对照者的rCBF进行量化。还使用了模型的结果。在“平均”法中,记录了在不规则手动绘制的感兴趣区域(ROI)内每个像素的平均计数(cp-1)。在“最小-最大”法中,分别记录了白质和灰质在矩形ROI内的最小cp-1和最大cp-1。相对rCBF(rrCBF)计算为局部值与小脑值之比。与“平均”法相比,在临床研究和模型中,“最小-最大”法得出的白质rrCBF值系统性地更低。灰质结果未发现差异。在模型研究中,“最小-最大”法的rrCBF变异性比“平均”法更大,但在临床研究中,这种影响被较小的观察者间误差抵消。与“平均”法相比,“最小-最大”法显示患者与对照之间的平均局部差异更大。事实证明,“最小-最大”法执行起来更简单,观察者误差更小,并且在区分痴呆症患者与对照方面,其功能似乎至少与公认的“平均”法一样好。