Kingdom F A, Keeble D, Moulden B
McGill Vision Research Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Vision Res. 1995 Jan;35(1):79-91. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)e0079-z.
We have measured the sensitivity of the human visual system to sinusoidal modulations of orientation in micropattern-based textured stimuli. The result is the orientation modulation function, or OMF, which describes this sensitivity as a function of the spatial frequency of orientation modulation. We found that the OMF was bandpass with peak sensitivity at spatial frequencies ranging between 0.06 and 0.2 c/deg, depending on the size of the micropatterns. The OMF was found to be scale invariant, that is its position on the spatial frequency axis did not change with viewing distance when spatial frequency was measured in object rather than retinal units. This scale invariance was shown to result from the visual system taking into account the scale rather than the density of the micropatterns as viewing distance was changed. It has been argued by Bergen [(1991) Vision and visual dysfunction (Vol. 10B) New York: Macmillan] that scale invariance in textures is a consequence of the coupling of mechanisms which detect textural features with those which detect local luminance contrasts. We reasoned that Gabor micropattern textures might therefore show narrower OMFs compared to line micropattern textures. However we found no difference in OMF bandwidth between the Gabor and line micropattern textures, suggesting that the line micropatterns were acting as selectively as the Gabor micropatterns for the spatial scale of the mechanisms which detected the orientation modulation. Evidence is presented which suggests that the mechanisms which detected the orientation modulation in our stimuli are non-linear. Finally we showed similar OMFs for sine-wave and square-wave modulations of micropattern orientation, and similar OMFs for modulations of micropattern with orientation about the horizontal and about the vertical, the direction of modulation in both cases being horizontal. The implications of these findings for the mechanisms involved in orientation-defined texture processing is discussed.
我们测量了人类视觉系统对基于微图案的纹理刺激中方向正弦调制的敏感度。结果得到了方向调制函数(OMF),它将这种敏感度描述为方向调制空间频率的函数。我们发现,根据微图案的大小,OMF呈带通特性,在空间频率为0.06至0.2周/度之间具有峰值敏感度。OMF被发现具有尺度不变性,即当以物体而非视网膜单位测量空间频率时,其在空间频率轴上的位置不会随观察距离而变化。研究表明,这种尺度不变性是由于视觉系统在观察距离改变时考虑的是微图案的尺度而非密度。伯根[(1991年)《视觉与视觉功能障碍》(第10B卷),纽约:麦克米伦出版社]认为,纹理中的尺度不变性是检测纹理特征的机制与检测局部亮度对比度的机制相互耦合的结果。我们推断,与线条微图案纹理相比,加博尔微图案纹理可能会呈现出更窄的OMF。然而,我们发现加博尔微图案纹理和线条微图案纹理在OMF带宽上没有差异,这表明对于检测方向调制的机制的空间尺度而言,线条微图案与加博尔微图案的作用具有同等选择性。文中给出的证据表明,我们的刺激中检测方向调制的机制是非线性的。最后,我们展示了微图案方向的正弦波和方波调制具有相似的OMF,以及微图案在水平和垂直方向上的方向调制具有相似的OMF,两种情况下调制方向均为水平方向。我们还讨论了这些发现对参与方向定义纹理处理的机制的影响。