• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Handpiece asepsis: a survey of the attitudes of dental practitioners.

作者信息

Lloyd L, Burke F J, Cheung S W

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Dental Hospital of Manchester.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 1995 Jan 7;178(1):23-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808638.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.4808638
PMID:7841014
Abstract

The methods of handpiece asepsis employed by general dental practitioners (GDPs) in England and the problems considered to be associated with handpiece sterilisation were investigated by means of a postal questionnaire distributed to a random sample of 500 GDPs during July 1993. A total of 267 replies were received (53.4% response). The results indicated that at the time of the survey, autoclavable handpieces were possessed by 90.6% of the respondents (n = 242), with 45.9% (n = 111) of these respondents indicating that they autoclaved their handpieces routinely after every patient. Reasons given by respondents for not autoclaving handpieces routinely included insufficient handpieces, fear of handpiece damage, cost, and the consideration that sterilisation was not necessary. Handpiece asepsis procedures had been upgraded by 89% (n = 237) of respondents in the 5 years preceding the survey. Media coverage was found to have exerted influence on the respondent dentists' behaviour, with the overall incidence of routine handpiece autoclaving increasing by 20.6% after media coverage of the subject.

摘要

相似文献

1
Handpiece asepsis: a survey of the attitudes of dental practitioners.
Br Dent J. 1995 Jan 7;178(1):23-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808638.
2
Comparison of handpiece asepsis among Ohio dentists: 1991 & 1992.俄亥俄州牙医手机无菌情况比较:1991年与1992年
Focus Ohio Dent. 1993 Fall-Winter;67(2):8-9, 12.
3
Handpiece sterilization: is it really necessary?机头消毒:真的有必要吗?
J Calif Dent Assoc. 1996 Jan;24(1):34-7.
4
Keys to successful handpiece maintenance.成功进行牙钻保养的关键。
Tex Dent J. 1997 Dec;114(12):15-9.
5
Improvements in cross-infection control in general dental practice.一般牙科诊所交叉感染控制的改善。
Br Dent J. 1995 Jul 8;179(1):19-21. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808808.
6
An investigation of the effect of repeated autoclaving on the speed of some dental turbines in general dental practice.一般牙科实践中重复高压灭菌对某些牙科涡轮机转速影响的调查。
J Dent. 1998 Jan;26(1):75-7. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00073-5.
7
Cross contamination control and the dental handpiece.交叉污染控制与牙科手机
J Prosthet Dent. 1995 May;73(5):492-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80081-2.
8
Evaluation of sterilization of dental handpieces by heating in synthetic compressor lubricant.在合成压缩机油中加热对牙科手机进行消毒的评估。
Gen Dent. 1999 Mar-Apr;47(2):158-60.
9
Prevention of infection in dental procedures.牙科手术中的感染预防。
J Hosp Infect. 1997 Jan;35(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(97)90164-x.
10
Survey of the decontamination and maintenance of dental handpieces in general dental practice.普通牙科诊所中牙科手机的消毒与维护调查
Br Dent J. 2009 Aug 22;207(4):E7; discussion 160-1. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.761.

引用本文的文献

1
The experience of dental practices that use automatic washer disinfectors.使用自动清洗消毒器的牙科诊所的经验。
J Infect Prev. 2019 Jan;20(1):25-31. doi: 10.1177/1757177418795044. Epub 2018 Sep 29.