Suppr超能文献

Teicoplanin plus pefloxacine versus teicoplanin plus netilmicin in empiric therapy of febrile patients with cancer and neutropenia. A randomized study of two once daily regimens in patients with previously inserted catheters.

作者信息

Studená M, Hlavácová E, Hel'pianska L, Vonkomerová A, Lacka J, Studená V, Kukucková E, Kollár T, Pichna P, Sálek T

机构信息

National Cancer Institute and Postgraduate Medical School, Bratislava, Slovakia.

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 1994;40(6):431-4. doi: 10.1159/000239304.

Abstract

In a comparative randomized trial, teicoplanin 5 mg/kg plus either netilmicin 5 mg/kg or pefloxacine 10 mg/kg was administered in a once daily empiric therapy to 40 cancer patients with fever and neutropenia after cytotoxic chemotherapy. Both regimens were analyzed with respect to the localisation of the underlying disease, catheter presence and agents isolated from blood culture. The cure and improvement rate were 80% (teicoplanin plus netilmicin) and 85% (teicoplanin plus pefloxacin), with no statistically significant difference between the groups. Teicoplanin with either an aminoglycoside or a quinolone administered once daily seems to be a suitable approach in empiric therapy for fever in neutropenia and may prevent catheter insertion in cancer patients.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验