Tan Z K, Tang Y Z, Zheng Y M
Wuhan General Hospital, GuangZhou Unit, People's Liberation Army.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 1994 Apr;32(4):201-3.
Since there are short comings in injury severity score (ISS) for evaluation of multiple injuries. We modified it 482 cases by expanding the 3 injury sites of 3 main areas of ISS to 7 injury sites in 4 areas. Comparison of the two scores showed that in ISS, only 72.84% of the injuries were shown and in the modified about 97.56%. Statistical analysis and clinical observations indicated that that RISS is accurate in evaluating patients with multiple injuries.
由于损伤严重度评分(ISS)在评估多发伤方面存在不足。我们对482例患者进行了改良,将ISS三个主要区域的3个损伤部位扩展为4个区域的7个损伤部位。两种评分的比较显示,在ISS中,仅显示了72.84%的损伤,而在改良评分中约为97.56%。统计分析和临床观察表明,改良损伤严重度评分(RISS)在评估多发伤患者方面是准确的。