Simon A, Benshushan A, Shushan A, Zajicek G, Dorembus D, Lewin A, Laufer N
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hadassah University, Hospital Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hum Reprod. 1994 Oct;9(10):1813-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138340.
A randomized prospective study was undertaken to compare low and standard luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa) dosage used in combination with gonadotrophins in ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). A total of 42 ovulatory patients with mechanical infertility were administered 0.5 mg/day LHRHa (Decapeptyl) from day 21 of their cycles for 14 days. Following down-regulation, patients were randomly allocated to continue with the same dose of LHRHa (22 patients, group A) or to receive a lower dose of 0.1 mg/day LHRHa (20 patients, group B) during folliculogenesis. Luteal phase was supported by daily i.m. progesterone (50 mg) injections and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; 1500 IU) every 4 days. Ovarian response, human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) dosage used for induction of ovulation, evidence of premature luteinization, and clinical and laboratory IVF outcome, were compared between groups A and B. The two groups were comparable in respect of: age (32.6 +/- 0.7 and 33.0 +/- 0.9 years), HMG dosage (33.0 +/- 1.6 and 36.0 +/- 2.5 ampoules), day of HCG (11.2 +/- 0.3 and 12.2 +/- 0.4), oocytes/patient (13.3 +/- 1.0 and 12.9 +/- 1.3), fertilization rate (68.5 and 65.2%), cleavage rate (95% for both), pregnancy/embryo transfer (32 and 35%) and implantation rate (10.8 and 10.5%), for groups A and B respectively. There was no evidence of premature luteinization or luteolysis in either group. It was concluded that lowering the dose of LHRHa to 0.1 mg/day during folliculogenesis had no adverse effect on ovarian response or clinical results. However, it had no advantage in reducing the HMG dose used for ovulation induction.
开展了一项随机前瞻性研究,比较低剂量和标准剂量的促黄体生成素释放激素激动剂(LHRHa)与促性腺激素联合用于体外受精(IVF)卵巢刺激的效果。共有42例机械性不孕的排卵患者从其月经周期的第21天开始,每天注射0.5毫克LHRHa(曲普瑞林),持续14天。降调节后,患者被随机分配在卵泡生成期继续使用相同剂量的LHRHa(22例患者,A组)或接受较低剂量的每天0.1毫克LHRHa(20例患者,B组)。黄体期通过每天肌肉注射黄体酮(50毫克)和每4天注射人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG;1500国际单位)来支持。比较了A组和B组之间的卵巢反应、用于诱导排卵的人绝经期促性腺激素(HMG)剂量、过早黄素化的证据以及IVF的临床和实验室结果。两组在以下方面具有可比性:年龄(分别为32.6±0.7岁和33.0±0.9岁)、HMG剂量(分别为33.0±1.6安瓿和36.0±2.5安瓿)、HCG注射日(分别为11.2±0.3和12.2±0.4)、每位患者的卵母细胞数(分别为13.3±1.0和12.9±1.3)、受精率(分别为68.5%和65.2%)、分裂率(两组均为95%)、妊娠/胚胎移植率(分别为32%和35%)以及着床率(分别为10.8%和10.5%)。两组均未出现过早黄素化或黄体溶解的证据。得出的结论是,在卵泡生成期将LHRHa剂量降至每天0.1毫克对卵巢反应或临床结果没有不良影响。然而,在减少用于诱导排卵的HMG剂量方面没有优势。