J Health Polit Policy Law. 1994 Fall;19(3):499-541. doi: 10.1215/03616878-19-3-499.
This commentary is the joint product of a group of concerned scholars, many of them long associated with this journal. It assesses the debate over health care reform with the goal of minimizing the many myths and misunderstandings that exist. We address eight issues most likely to engender confusion: (1) the question whether cost control and universal coverage are contradictory goals, (2) the definition of universal coverage, (3) sources of bureaucracy in a reformed health care system, (4) the meanings of "competition" and "regulation," (5) the difference between short- and long-term measures to control costs, (6) subsidization of universal health care, (7) the role of medical care professionals in decision making about the delivery of services, and (8) the meaning of "choice" for patients and caregivers.
本评论是一群忧心忡忡的学者的共同成果,他们中的许多人与本期刊长期合作。其评估了关于医疗改革的辩论,目的是尽量减少现存的诸多错误观念和误解。我们探讨了八个最容易引发混淆的问题:(1)成本控制与全民医保是否相互矛盾的目标这一问题;(2)全民医保的定义;(3)改革后的医疗体系中官僚作风的来源;(4)“竞争”和“监管”的含义;(5)控制成本的短期和长期措施之间的差异;(6)全民医保的补贴;(7)医疗专业人员在服务提供决策中的作用;(8)患者和护理人员的“选择”的含义。