• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种新型核心材料与银合金增强玻璃离子材料的径向拉伸强度、弯曲强度和抗压强度的比较。

A comparison of the diametral tensile strength, the flexural strength, and the compressive strength of two new core materials to a silver alloy-reinforced glass-ionomer material.

作者信息

Levartovsky S, Kuyinu E, Georgescu M, Goldstein G R

机构信息

Division of Restorative and Prosthodontic Sciences, Kriser Dental Center, New York University, New York.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Nov;72(5):481-5. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90118-x.

DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(94)90118-x
PMID:7844747
Abstract

This study compared three mechanical properties of two recently introduced core materials, a light-activated glass ionomer cement (VariGlass VLC) and a fluoride-release dual cure composite resin (FluoroCore), with those of a conventional silver-reinforced glass-ionomer cement (Miracle Mix). Seventy-two samples (eight per product for each property) were prepared for testing diametral tensile strength, flexural strength, and compressive strength. The specimens were cured, stored for 24 hours at 37 degrees C in 100% humidity, and tested with the use of an Instron universal testing machine. The results of this study indicate that the diametral tensile strength, flexural strength, and compressive strength of the FluoroCore and VariGlass VLC materials were significantly higher than those of the conventional Miracle Mix. The values obtained with FluoroCore material were consistently higher than those obtained with VariGlass VLC material.

摘要

本研究比较了两种新推出的核心材料——一种光固化玻璃离子水门汀(VariGlass VLC)和一种释氟双固化复合树脂(FluoroCore)——与一种传统的银增强玻璃离子水门汀(Miracle Mix)的三种力学性能。制备了72个样本(每种性能的每种产品8个),用于测试径向拉伸强度、弯曲强度和抗压强度。样本固化后,在37摄氏度、100%湿度条件下储存24小时,然后使用英斯特朗万能试验机进行测试。本研究结果表明,FluoroCore和VariGlass VLC材料的径向拉伸强度、弯曲强度和抗压强度显著高于传统的Miracle Mix。FluoroCore材料获得的值始终高于VariGlass VLC材料获得的值。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the diametral tensile strength, the flexural strength, and the compressive strength of two new core materials to a silver alloy-reinforced glass-ionomer material.两种新型核心材料与银合金增强玻璃离子材料的径向拉伸强度、弯曲强度和抗压强度的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Nov;72(5):481-5. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90118-x.
2
Shear bond strength of several new core materials.几种新型核心材料的剪切粘结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Feb;75(2):154-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90092-x.
3
Laboratory strength of glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cements.玻璃离子水门汀和磷酸锌水门汀的实验室强度。
J Prosthodont. 2001 Sep;10(3):140-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2001.00140.x.
4
Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites.玻璃离子水门汀、复合体和树脂复合材料的实验室强度。
J Prosthodont. 2002 Jun;11(2):86-91.
5
Properties related to strength and resistance to abrasion of VariGlass VLC, Fuji II L.C., Ketac-Silver, and Z-100 composite resin.VariGlass VLC、Fuji II L.C.、Ketac-Silver和Z-100复合树脂的强度及耐磨性相关特性。
ASDC J Dent Child. 1994 Jan-Feb;61(1):17-20.
6
In vitro evaluation of five core materials.五种核心材料的体外评估
J Prosthodont. 2007 Jan-Feb;16(1):25-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00149.x.
7
Diametral tensile and compressive strengths of several types of core materials.几种类型的核心材料的直径拉伸强度和抗压强度。
J Prosthodont. 2008 Feb;17(2):102-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00269.x. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
8
Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials.六种增强修复材料的抗弯强度比较。
Gen Dent. 2001 Sep-Oct;49(5):484-8.
9
Strength properties of visible-light-cured resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.可见光固化树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的强度性能
Oper Dent. 1997 Mar-Apr;22(2):79-83.
10
Mechanical properties of two restorative reinforced glass-ionomer cements.两种修复性增强玻璃离子水门汀的力学性能。
J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Jul;29(7):682-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00908.x.

引用本文的文献

1
An In Vitro Study Comparing the Diametral Tensile Strength of Composite Core Build-Up Material With Three Different Prefabricated Post Systems.一项体外研究:比较复合树脂核桩修复材料与三种不同预成桩系统的直径拉伸强度
Cureus. 2022 Sep 25;14(9):e29560. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29560. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials - An study.Paracore®、Flourocore®2+和Multicore®树脂核桩修复材料的抗压、抗拉和抗弯强度的比较评估——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;24(6):576-579. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_529_21. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
3
Effect of Two Different Surface Treatments on Retention of Cosmopost with Two Different Core Materials.
两种不同表面处理对两种不同核材料的Cosmospost固位力的影响。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020 Mar 30;12:87-100. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S236323. eCollection 2020.
4
Comparative study of mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials.直接核桩修复材料力学性能的比较研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Jan-Mar;6(1):16-20. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.149285.
5
An in vitro comparative evaluation of physical properties of four different types of core materials.四种不同类型核心材料物理性能的体外比较评估
J Conserv Dent. 2014 May;17(3):230-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.131782.
6
The Comparison of Shear Bond Strength Between Fibre Reinforced Composite Posts with Three Different Composite Core Materials - An In vitro Study.三种不同复合树脂核材料的纤维增强复合桩之间的剪切粘结强度比较——一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jan;8(1):236-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7692.3941. Epub 2014 Jan 12.
7
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength and flexural strength of conventional core materials with nanohybrid composite resin core material an in vitro study.传统核心材料与纳米混合复合树脂核心材料抗压强度和抗弯强度的比较评估:一项体外研究
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Sep;13(3):281-9. doi: 10.1007/s13191-012-0236-4. Epub 2013 Jan 6.