Banich M T, Shenker J I
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Neuropsychologia. 1994 Oct;32(10):1179-94. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90101-5.
Evidence for a dissociation between memory for the identity of an item and memory for its frequency of occurrence was provided by two tachistoscopic studies employing lateralized abstract designs as stimuli. In both experiments, subjects viewed a random series of presentation trials, in which certain designs appeared only once, others 5 times, and still others 9 times. Then in a series of probe trials, subjects decided, on each trial, if a design was familiar or novel, either by an old/new decision (Experiment 1) or a forced-choice decision (Experiment 2), after which they estimated the frequency of item occurrence. Presentation and probe trials were either displayed in the same visual field (within-hemisphere trials) or opposite visual fields (across-hemisphere trials). Both experiments revealed that the pattern of interhemispheric processing as well as lateralized processing differed for item identity as compared to item frequency, providing further evidence for a dissociation between these two memory processes.
两项使用侧向化抽象设计作为刺激的速示研究,为物品身份记忆与其出现频率记忆之间的分离提供了证据。在这两项实验中,受试者观看一系列随机的呈现试验,其中某些设计只出现一次,其他设计出现5次,还有一些设计出现9次。然后在一系列探测试验中,受试者在每次试验中通过旧/新判断(实验1)或强制选择判断(实验2)来决定一个设计是熟悉还是新颖,之后他们估计物品出现的频率。呈现试验和探测试验要么显示在同一视野(半球内试验),要么显示在相对视野(跨半球试验)。两项实验均表明,与物品频率相比,半球间加工模式以及侧向化加工在物品身份方面存在差异,为这两个记忆过程之间的分离提供了进一步的证据。