Buysse D J, Reynolds C F, Kupfer D J, Thorpy M J, Bixler E, Manfredi R, Kales A, Vgontzas A, Stepanski E, Roth T
Sleep and Chronobiology Center, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania.
Sleep. 1994 Oct;17(7):630-7. doi: 10.1093/sleep/17.7.630.
Three diagnostic classifications for sleep disorders have been developed recently: the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD), the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th edition (DSM-IV), and the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10). No data have yet been published regarding the frequency of specific diagnoses within these systems or how the diagnostic systems relate to each other. To address these issues, we examined clinical sleep disorder diagnoses (without polysomnography) in 257 patients (216 insomnia patients and 41 medical/psychiatric patients) evaluated at five sleep centers. A sleep specialist interviewed each patient and assigned clinical diagnoses using ICSD, DSM-IV and ICD-10 classifications. "Sleep disorder associated with mood disorder" was the most frequent ICSD primary diagnosis (32.3% of cases), followed by "Psychophysiological insomnia" (12.5% of cases). The most frequent DSM-IV primary diagnoses were "Insomnia related to another mental disorder" (44% of cases) and "Primary insomnia" (20.2% of cases), and the most frequent ICD-10 diagnoses were "Insomnia due to emotional causes" (61.9% of cases) and "Insomnia of organic origin" (8.9% of cases). When primary and secondary diagnoses were considered, insomnia related to psychiatric disorders was diagnosed in over 75% of patients. The more narrowly defined ICSD diagnoses nested logically within the broader DSM-IV and ICD-10 categories. We found substantial site-related differences in diagnostic patterns. These results confirm the importance of psychiatric and behavioral factors in clinicians' assessments of insomnia patients across all three diagnostic systems. ICSD and DSM-IV sleep disorder diagnoses have similar patterns of use by experienced clinicians.
《国际睡眠障碍分类》(ICSD)、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第4版(DSM-IV)以及《国际疾病分类》第10版(ICD-10)。目前尚未发表有关这些系统内特定诊断的频率或诊断系统之间相互关系的数据。为解决这些问题,我们对在五个睡眠中心接受评估的257名患者(216名失眠患者和41名内科/精神科患者)的临床睡眠障碍诊断(未进行多导睡眠图检查)进行了研究。一名睡眠专家对每位患者进行了访谈,并使用ICSD、DSM-IV和ICD-10分类法进行临床诊断。“与情绪障碍相关的睡眠障碍”是ICSD最常见的主要诊断(占病例的32.3%),其次是“心理生理性失眠”(占病例的12.5%)。DSM-IV最常见的主要诊断是“与另一种精神障碍相关的失眠”(占病例的44%)和“原发性失眠”(占病例的20.2%),而ICD-10最常见的诊断是“情绪原因导致的失眠”(占病例的61.9%)和“器质性失眠”(占病例的8.9%)。当考虑主要和次要诊断时,超过75%的患者被诊断为与精神障碍相关的失眠。定义更狭窄的ICSD诊断在逻辑上嵌套于更宽泛的DSM-IV和ICD-10类别之中。我们发现诊断模式存在显著的地点相关差异。这些结果证实了精神和行为因素在所有三种诊断系统中临床医生对失眠患者评估中的重要性。经验丰富的临床医生对ICSD和DSM-IV睡眠障碍的诊断使用模式相似。