Abernethy M, Bass N, Sharpe N, Grant C, Neutze J, Clarkson P, Greaves S, Lennon D, Snow S, Whalley G
Department of Medicine, University of Auckland School of Medicine, New Zealand.
Aust N Z J Med. 1994 Oct;24(5):530-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1994.tb01753.x.
The incidence of acute rheumatic fever in New Zealand remains relatively high. Reliable early diagnosis of carditis is difficult and important in management.
To determine if Doppler echocardiography contributed to the early diagnosis of carditis in acute rheumatic fever.
Forty-seven patients admitted to hospital with suspected acute rheumatic fever and 19 control patients, with a febrile illness due to a documented non-cardiac bacterial infection, were assessed two days and two weeks following admission. Presence or absence of clinical carditis was determined by a cardiologist unaware of the suspected diagnosis, from clinical examination, chest radiograph, electrocardiogram (ECG) and two dimensional echocardiogram. Doppler echocardiography was then performed and interpreted by a second cardiologist unaware of the diagnosis. After completion of the study the Jones criteria were applied, to categorise the patients with suspected acute rheumatic fever into four groups for the final diagnosis: no acute rheumatic fever, possible acute rheumatic fever, definite acute rheumatic fever without carditis, and definite acute rheumatic fever with carditis.
In 19 patients with a final diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever and carditis at the baseline assessment carditis was detected by clinical assessment in 15 patients, compared with 19 patients with evidence of significant valve regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography. Following the two week assessment, all 19 patients had both clinical and Doppler evidence of carditis. Five patients with a final clinical diagnosis of possible acute rheumatic fever or definite acute rheumatic fever without carditis, had a Doppler abnormality detected. There was no clinical or Doppler abnormality in the febrile controls.
Doppler echocardiography is more sensitive than clinical assessment in the detection of carditis in acute rheumatic fever, and can contribute to earlier diagnosis.
新西兰急性风湿热的发病率仍然相对较高。在管理中,可靠的心脏炎早期诊断困难但很重要。
确定多普勒超声心动图是否有助于急性风湿热心脏炎的早期诊断。
47例因疑似急性风湿热入院的患者和19例因记录在案的非心脏细菌感染导致发热性疾病的对照患者,在入院后两天和两周进行评估。由一位不知道疑似诊断的心脏病专家通过临床检查、胸部X光片、心电图(ECG)和二维超声心动图确定是否存在临床心脏炎。然后由另一位不知道诊断结果的心脏病专家进行多普勒超声心动图检查并解读。研究完成后,应用琼斯标准将疑似急性风湿热患者分为四组进行最终诊断:无急性风湿热、可能急性风湿热、明确的无心脏炎急性风湿热和明确的有心脏炎急性风湿热。
在基线评估时最终诊断为急性风湿热和心脏炎的19例患者中,15例通过临床评估检测到心脏炎,而多普勒超声心动图显示有19例存在明显瓣膜反流证据。在两周评估后,所有19例患者均有临床和多普勒心脏炎证据。5例最终临床诊断为可能急性风湿热或明确的无心脏炎急性风湿热的患者检测到多普勒异常。发热对照组无临床或多普勒异常。
在急性风湿热心脏炎的检测中,多普勒超声心动图比临床评估更敏感,有助于早期诊断。